FBXO6介导的ERO1L泛素化降解对膀胱癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭的作用研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2022.03.004

目的

探究F盒蛋白6 （FBXO6）对膀胱癌细胞的作用及其作用机制。

方法

体外培养人正常膀胱上皮细胞株（SV-HUC-1）和人膀胱癌细胞株（T24）。用过表达载体阴性对照（oe-NC）、过表达FBXO6 （oe-FBXO6）、过表达内质网氧化还原蛋白-1样蛋白（oe-ERO1L）及oe-FBXO6和oe-ERO1L慢病毒液（MOI = 20）感染T24细胞。RT-qPCR检测细胞FBXO6和ERO1L mRNA表达；放线菌酮（CHX）蛋白合成抑制实验检测T24细胞ERO1L蛋白稳定性；免疫共沉淀（Co-IP）实验检测FBXO6对ERO1L泛素化调控；Western blot检测细胞FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达；CCK-8检测细胞活力；克隆形成实验检测细胞增殖；Transwell实验检测细胞迁移和侵袭。两组间比较采用独立样本t检验，多组间比较采用单因素方差分析，组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验。

结果

与SV-HUC-1相比，T24细胞中FBXO6 mRNA （1.00±0.05比0.33±0.02）和蛋白表达（1.00±0.11比0.31±0.03）均降低（P均< 0.05），而ERO1L mRNA （1.00±0.05比2.70±0.12）和蛋白表达（1.00±0.16比3.27±0.09）均升高（P均< 0.05）。FBXO6可降低ERO1L蛋白稳定性并促进ERO1L泛素化。与空白对照和oe-NC相比，oe-FBXO6细胞中FBXO6 mRNA （1.00±0.06比3.74±0.18）和蛋白表达（1.00±0.10比2.25±0.06）均升高，ERO1L蛋白表达（0.99±0.08比0.21±0.03），细胞活力、克隆形成数[（78.00±3.00）比（41.67±2.52）个]、迁移[（150.67±5.03）比（91.67±5.51）个]和侵袭细胞数[（122.00±7.00）比（74.67±5.51）个]均降低（P均< 0.05）；与oe-NC相比，oe-ERO1L细胞中ERO1L蛋白表达（1.01±0.06比2.58±0.02）、细胞活力、克隆形成数[ （78.00±3.00）比（121.67±7.64）个]、迁移[（150.67±5.03）比（230.33±12.01）个]和侵袭细胞数[（122.00±7.00）比（203.00± 11.53）个]均升高（P均< 0.05）；与oe-FBXO6相比，oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L细胞中ERO1L蛋白表达（0.54±0.02比1.02±0.06），细胞活力、克隆形成数[（41.67±2.52）比（62.00±3.61）个]、迁移[（91.67±5.51）比（131.67±6.03）个]和侵袭细胞数[（74.67±5.51）比（102.67±7.51）个]均升高（P均< 0.05）。

结论

FBXO6通过介导ERO1L泛素化降解抑制膀胱癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭。

关键词: 膀胱癌, F盒蛋白6, 内质网氧化还原蛋白-1样蛋白, 迁移, 侵袭

Objective

To explore the effect of F-box protein 6 (FBXO6) on bladder cancer cells and its possible mechanism.

Methods

Human normal bladder epithelial cell line (SV-HUC-1) and human bladder cancer cell line (T24) were cultured in vitro. T24 cells were infected with negative control for overexpression vector (oe-NC) , overexpression FBXO6 (oe-FBXO6) , overexpression ERO1L (oe-ERO1L) and oe-FBXO6 and oe-ERO1L lentivirus (MOI = 20) . RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of FBXO6 and endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin-1-like protein (ERO1L) mRNA in T24 cells; the cycloheximide protein synthesis inhibition test was used to detect the stability of ERO1L protein; co-immunoprecipitation experiment was used to detect the effect of FBXO6 on the ubiquitination of ERO1L; Western blot was used to detect the expression of FBXO6 and ERO1L protein in cells; CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability; clone formation experiment was used to detect the proliferation of cells; Transwell experiment was used to detect the migration and invasion of cells. Independent sample t test was used for comparison between two groups, one-way ANOVA was used for comparison between multiple groups, and LSD-t test was used for comparison between two groups.

Results

Compared with the SV-HUC-1 cells, the expression of FBXO6 mRNA and protein cells (1.00±0.05 vs 0.33±0.02) (1.00±0.11 vs 0.31±0.03) was significantly lower in T24 cells (both P < 0.05) , while the expression of ERO1L mRNA and protein (1.00±0.05 vs 2.70±0.12) (1.00±0.16 vs 3.27±0.09) was significantly increased (both P < 0.05) . FBXO6 could inhibit the stability of ERO1L protein and promote ERO1L ubiquitination. Compared with the blank control and the OE-NC cells, the expression of FBXO6 mRNA and protein (1.00±0.06 vs 3.74±0.18) (1.00±0.10 vs 2.25±0.06) was significantly increased in the oe-FBXO6 cells (both P < 0.05) , while the expression of ERO1L protein (0.99±0.08 vs 0.21±0.03) , cell viability, number of clones (78.00±3.00 vs 41.67±2.52) , the number of migration (150.67±5.03 vs 91.67±5.51) and invasion cells (122.00±7.00 vs 74.67±5.51) were significantly reduced (all P < 0.05) ; Compared with the oe-NC cells, the expression of ERO1L protein (1.01±0.06 vs 2.58±0.02) , cell viability, number of clones (78.00±3.00 vs 121.67±7.64) , number of migrating (150.67±5.03 vs 230.33±12.01) and invading cells (122.00±7.00 vs 203.00±11.53) were significantly increased in the ox-ERO1L cells (all P < 0.05) ; Compared with the oe-FBXO6 cells, the expression of ERO1L protein (0.54±0.02 vs 1.02±0.06) , cell viability, number of clones (41.67±2.52 vs 62.00±3.61) , number of migrating (91.67±5.51 vs 131.67±6.03) and invasive cells (74.67±5.51 vs 102.67±7.51) were significantly increased (all P < 0.05) .

Conclusion

FBXO6 inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells by mediating the degradation of ERO1L ubiquitination.

Key words: Bladder cancer, F-box protein 6, Endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin-1-like protein, Migration, Invasion

表1 引物序列信息

基因	序列（5'→3'）	预期扩增产物长度（bp）
FBXO6	上游ACAGCTTCAGGACACGCAG	320
	下游GAGGTTCCTATGCAGGCTCC
ERO1L	上游GACATCAGCCAGTGTGGAAGA	271
	下游TCTTCTTAGATGACCACCAGCA
GAPDH （内参）	上游AATGGGCAGCCGTTAGGAAA	168
	下游GCGCCCAATACGACCAAATC

表1 引物序列信息

基因	序列（5'→3'）	预期扩增产物长度（bp）
FBXO6	上游ACAGCTTCAGGACACGCAG	320
	下游GAGGTTCCTATGCAGGCTCC
ERO1L	上游GACATCAGCCAGTGTGGAAGA	271
	下游TCTTCTTAGATGACCACCAGCA
GAPDH （内参）	上游AATGGGCAGCCGTTAGGAAA	168
	下游GCGCCCAATACGACCAAATC

图1 Western blot检测细胞FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达

表2 SV-HUC-1和T24细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L的表达（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6		ERO1L
分组	mRNA	蛋白表达	mRNA	蛋白表达
SV-HUC-1细胞	1.00±0.05	1.00±0.11	1.00±0.05	1.00±0.16
T24细胞	0.33±0.02	0.31±0.03	2.70±0.12	3.27±0.09
t值	21.552	29.715	33.094	54.251
P值	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001

表2 SV-HUC-1和T24细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L的表达（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6		ERO1L
分组	mRNA	蛋白表达	mRNA	蛋白表达
SV-HUC-1细胞	1.00±0.05	1.00±0.11	1.00±0.05	1.00±0.16
T24细胞	0.33±0.02	0.31±0.03	2.70±0.12	3.27±0.09
t值	21.552	29.715	33.094	54.251
P值	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001

图2 Western blot检测细胞FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达

图3 FBXO6对T24细胞中ERO1L蛋白稳定性的影响注：Western blot检测细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达；放线菌酮CHX蛋白合成抑制实验检测细胞ERO1L蛋白稳定性，^aP < 0.05，n = 3

表3 FBXO6对T24细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6		ERO1L
分组	mRNA	蛋白表达	mRNA	蛋白表达
空白对照	1.00±0.04	1.00±0.10	1.00±0.05	0.99±0.08
oe-NC	1.00±0.06	0.98±0.12	0.99±0.04	1.02±0.06
oe-FBXO6	3.74±0.18^a	2.25±0.06^a	0.98±0.05	0.21±0.03^a
F值	93.534	74.385	0.147	69.356
P值	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001

表3 FBXO6对T24细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6		ERO1L
分组	mRNA	蛋白表达	mRNA	蛋白表达
空白对照	1.00±0.04	1.00±0.10	1.00±0.05	0.99±0.08
oe-NC	1.00±0.06	0.98±0.12	0.99±0.04	1.02±0.06
oe-FBXO6	3.74±0.18^a	2.25±0.06^a	0.98±0.05	0.21±0.03^a
F值	93.534	74.385	0.147	69.356
P值	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001

图4 免疫共沉淀实验检测FBXO6对ERO1L泛素化调控

图5 Western blot检测细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达

表4 Western blot检测细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6蛋白表达	ERO1L蛋白表达
空白对照	1.00±0.07	1.00±0.06
oe-NC	0.99±0.06	1.01±0.06
oe-FBXO6	2.27±0.06^a	0.54±0.02^a
oe-ERO1L	1.10±0.05	2.58±0.02^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	2.23±0.06^a	1.02±0.06^b
F值	68.253	74.384
P值	0.001	0.001

表4 Western blot检测细胞中FBXO6和ERO1L蛋白表达（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	FBXO6蛋白表达	ERO1L蛋白表达
空白对照	1.00±0.07	1.00±0.06
oe-NC	0.99±0.06	1.01±0.06
oe-FBXO6	2.27±0.06^a	0.54±0.02^a
oe-ERO1L	1.10±0.05	2.58±0.02^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	2.23±0.06^a	1.02±0.06^b
F值	68.253	74.384
P值	0.001	0.001

图6 倒置显微镜下观察FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞克隆形成数的影响（结晶紫染色，×1）注：与oe-NC比较，^aP < 0.05；与oe-FBXO6比较，^bP < 0.05；n = 3；ns为差异无统计学意义

表5 FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞活力的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	OD值（450 nm）
分组	0 h	24 h	48 h	72 h
空白对照	0.26±0.02	0.46±0.02	0.79±0.03	1.24±0.09
oe-NC	0.25±0.01	0.46±0.03	0.78±0.03	1.23±0.08
oe-FBXO6	0.25±0.01	0.38±0.01^a	0.53±0.04^a	0.77±0.02^a
oe-ERO1L	0.26±0.01	0.54±0.03^a	0.92±0.03^a	1.53±0.09^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	0.26±0.01	0.46±0.02^b	0.65±0.03^b	1.03±0.07^b
F值	2.402	12.483	21.579	33.583
P值	0.294	0.005	0.001	0.001

表5 FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞活力的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	OD值（450 nm）
分组	0 h	24 h	48 h	72 h
空白对照	0.26±0.02	0.46±0.02	0.79±0.03	1.24±0.09
oe-NC	0.25±0.01	0.46±0.03	0.78±0.03	1.23±0.08
oe-FBXO6	0.25±0.01	0.38±0.01^a	0.53±0.04^a	0.77±0.02^a
oe-ERO1L	0.26±0.01	0.54±0.03^a	0.92±0.03^a	1.53±0.09^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	0.26±0.01	0.46±0.02^b	0.65±0.03^b	1.03±0.07^b
F值	2.402	12.483	21.579	33.583
P值	0.294	0.005	0.001	0.001

图7 倒置显微镜下观察FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞迁移和侵袭的影响（结晶紫染色，×200）注：迁移和侵袭结果显示，空白对照被染色的细胞数较多；oe-NC细胞数与空白对照相比差异无统计学意义；oe-FBXO6细胞被染色的细胞数比oe-NC减少；oe-ERO1L细胞被染色的细胞数比oe-NC增多；oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L细胞被染色的细胞数比oe-FBXO6减少

表6 FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞迁移和侵袭的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	迁移细胞数（个/每个视野）	侵袭细胞数（个/每个视野）
空白对照	149.33±7.51	124.00±8.00
oe-NC	150.67±5.03	122.00±7.00
oe-FBXO6	91.67±5.51^a	74.67±5.51^a
oe-ERO1L	230.33±12.01^a	203.00±11.53^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	131.67±6.03^b	102.67±7.51^b
F值	48.384	39.293
P值	0.001	0.001

表6 FBXO6/ERO1L轴对T24细胞迁移和侵袭的影响（ ± s，n = 3）

分组	迁移细胞数（个/每个视野）	侵袭细胞数（个/每个视野）
空白对照	149.33±7.51	124.00±8.00
oe-NC	150.67±5.03	122.00±7.00
oe-FBXO6	91.67±5.51^a	74.67±5.51^a
oe-ERO1L	230.33±12.01^a	203.00±11.53^a
oe-FBXO6+oe-ERO1L	131.67±6.03^b	102.67±7.51^b
F值	48.384	39.293
P值	0.001	0.001

1	Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, et al. Epidemiology of bladder cancer: a systematic review and contemporary update of risk factors in 2018[J]. EurUrol, 2018, 74(6):784-795.
2	Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, et al. Bladder cancer: a review[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(19):1980-1991.
3	Patel VG, Oh WK, GalskyMD. Treatment of muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer in 2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(5):404-423.
4	Du X, Meng F, Peng D, et al. Noncanonical role of FBXO6 in regulating antiviral immunity[J]. J Immunol, 2019, 203(4):1012-1020.
5	Hong X, Huang H, Qiu X, et al. Targeting posttranslational modifications of RIOK1 inhibits the progression of colorectal and gastric cancers[J]. Elife, 2018, 7(5):e2951-e2964.
6	Chen X, Duan LH, Luo PC, et al. FBXO6-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Ero1L inhibits endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2016, 39(6):2501-2508.
7	Han F, Xu Q, Zhao J, et al. ERO1L promotes pancreatic cancer cell progression through activating the Wnt/catenin pathway[J]. J Cell Biochem, 2018, 119(11):8996-9005.
8	Sjödahl G, Jackson CL, Bartlett JM, et al. Molecular profiling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: more than the sum of its parts[J]. J Pathol, 2019, 247(5):563-573.
9	Pham A, Ballas LK. Trimodality therapy for bladder cancer: modern management and future directions[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2019, 29(3):210-215.
10	Nguyen KM, Busino L. The biology of F-box proteins: The SCF family of E3 ubiquitin ligases[J]. AdvExp Med Biol, 2020, 1217(5):111-122.
11	Yan L, Lin M, Pan S, et al. Emerging roles of F-box proteins in cancer drug resistance[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2020, 49(3):1006-1015.
12	Liu Y, Pan B, Qu W, et al. Systematic analysis of the expression and prognosis relevance of FBXO family reveals the significance of FBXO1 in human breast cancer[J]. Cancer Cell Int, 2021, 21(1):130-144.
13	Ji M, Zhao Z, Li Y, et al. FBXO6-mediated RNASET2 ubiquitination and degradation governs the development of ovarian cancer[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2021, 12(4):317.
14	Cai L, Li J, Zhao J, et al. Fbxo6 confers drug-sensitization to cisplatin via inhibiting the activation of Chk1 in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. FEBS Lett, 2019, 593(14):1827-1836.
15	Nakamura N. Ubiquitin system[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(4):1080-1089.
16	Xu H, Ju L, Xiong Y, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF126 affects bladder cancer progression through regulation of PTEN stability[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2021, 12(3):239-252.
17	Wang G, Chen S, Xie Z, et al. TGFβ attenuates cartilage extracellular matrix degradation via enhancing FBXO6-mediated MMP14 ubiquitination[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(8):1111-1120.
18	Konno T, Pinho Melo E, Lopes C, et al. ERO1-independent production of H₂O₂ within the endoplasmic reticulum fuels Prdx4-mediated oxidative protein folding[J]. J Cell Biol, 2015, 211(2):253-259.
19	Shi X, Wu J, Liu Y, et al. ERO1L promotes NSCLC development by modulating cell cycle-related molecules[J]. Cell BiolInt, 2020, 44(12):2473-2484.
20	Seol SY, Kim C, Lim JY, et al. Overexpression of endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin 1-α (ERO1L) is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2016, 48(4):1196-1209.
21	Hayes KE, Batsomboon P, Chen WC, et al. Inhibition of the FAD containing ER oxidoreductin 1 (Ero1) protein by EN-460 as a strategy for treatment of multiple myeloma[J]. Bioorg Med Chem, 2019, 27(8):1479-1488.

[1]	陈金业, 凌潜龙, 朱冰, 骆杰. 补体B因子在结直肠癌中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 192-198.
[2]	庞名扬, 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱清毅. 运用国产单孔机器人完成经膀胱入路膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-643.
[3]	林逸, 钟文龙, 李锴文, 何旺, 林天歆. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊（第15期）——转移性膀胱癌的综合治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 648-652.
[4]	刘中文, 刘畅, 高洋, 刘东, 林世庆, 杨建华, 赵福义. 尿液microRNA-326与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 386-391.
[5]	魏微阳, 杨浩, 周川鹏, 王奇, 黄红星, 黄亚强. 纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值及其列线图模型对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者电切术后复发的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-248.
[6]	赵蒙蒙, 黄洁, 余荣环, 王葆青. 过表达小GTP酶Rab32抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞侵袭性生长[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 512-518.
[7]	赵旭鹏, 王集琛, 田硕, 李宏召, 李修彬, 张旭. EP300 通过上调FKBP10 促进膀胱肿瘤细胞迁移和侵袭[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 264-274.
[8]	曾聿理, 雷发容, 肖慧, 邱德亮, 谢静, 吴寻. 氯普鲁卡因通过调控circRNA-ZKSCAN1表达抑制肝癌Huh-7细胞体外生长和转移的研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 220-228.
[9]	李晶, 潘侠, 周芳, 汪晶, 洪佳. 普鲁卡因通过上调lncRNA DGCR5抑制胃癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 151-158.
[10]	刘杜先, 张杰东, 付鲁渝, 熊志强, 龚程, 张小雅, 高明悦, 孟俊宏, 刘兰侠. 沉默circXPO1抑制肝癌细胞恶性生物学行为[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 159-166.
[11]	李博, 马秀岩, 孙杰. lncRNA TINCR对滋养层HTR-8/SVneo细胞生物学行为的影响及其机制[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 167-172.
[12]	崔精, 鲍一帆, 沈晓明, 杨增辉, 高森, 鲍传庆. 结直肠癌中circMFSD12对肿瘤细胞功能及5-FU敏感性的调控[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 294-302.
[13]	王国强, 张纲, 唐建坡, 张玉国, 杨永江. LINC00839 调节miR-17-5p/WEE1 轴对结直肠癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 491-499.
[14]	朱镭, 朱庆义. 金氏菌属：引起婴幼儿侵袭性传染病的新发病原体[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 229-237.
[15]	张芳芳, 李军, 赵玉洁, 于彤, 宁春平. 侵袭性血管黏液瘤的影像学特征并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 254-259.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Role of FBXO6-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of ERO1L in the proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Role of FBXO6-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of ERO1L in the proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells