切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 283 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2025.05.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

CBA预处理方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征的疗效及安全性分析
刘恒, 吴涛, 潘耀柱, 白海, 毛东锋, 田红娟, 石亚军, 葸瑞()   
  1. 730050 兰州,联勤保障部队第九四〇医院血液科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-13 出版日期:2025-10-01
  • 通信作者: 葸瑞
  • 基金资助:
    兰州市青年科技人才创新项目(2023-QN-16); 甘肃省青年科技基金项目(23JRRA321); 甘肃省创新基地和人才计划(21JR7RA015); 甘肃省科技计划项目(25JRRA1184); 联勤保障部队第九四〇医院血液病医学研究中心项目(2021yxky078)

Efficacy and safety of CBA-based conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

Heng Liu, Tao Wu, Yaozhu Pan, Hai Bai, Dongfeng Mao, Hongjuan Tian, Yajun Shi, Rui Xi()   

  1. Department of Hematology, the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, China
  • Received:2025-08-13 Published:2025-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Rui Xi
引用本文:

刘恒, 吴涛, 潘耀柱, 白海, 毛东锋, 田红娟, 石亚军, 葸瑞. CBA预处理方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 283-289.

Heng Liu, Tao Wu, Yaozhu Pan, Hai Bai, Dongfeng Mao, Hongjuan Tian, Yajun Shi, Rui Xi. Efficacy and safety of CBA-based conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(05): 283-289.

目的

探讨CBA (克拉屈滨、白消安、阿糖胞苷)联合用药预处理方案的异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗高危急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2024年5月于联勤保障部队第九四〇医院血液科行CBA强化预处理方案的allo-HSCT治疗的AML/MDS患者临床资料。总结植入情况、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率、感染、复发率、总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)等。Kaplan-Meier法分析生存率,Fine-Gray竞争风险模型分析累积复发率及非复发死亡率,采用Log-rank检验比较组间差异。

结果

24例患者纳入研究,中位年龄35 (6 ~ 52)岁,AML 15例,MDS 9例,其中13例为复发/难治性AML。所有患者粒细胞均成功植入,粒细胞中位植入时间18 (13 ~ 22)d。22例患者血小板成功植入,血小板中位植入时间17 (9 ~ 30)d,2例血小板植入功能不良经治疗后缓解。急慢性GVHD的发生率分别为45.8%、16.7%。24例患者移植后均获完全缓解(CR),流式MRD阴性。中位随访44.5 (1.5 ~ 84)月,预期移植后3年OS率为57.8% (95 %CI:35.7 % ~ 74.6 %),PFS率为48.9 % (95 %CI:27.8 % ~ 67.0 %)。AML和MDS患者3年OS率分别为52.5 % (95 %CI:25.2 % ~ 73.9 %)、66.7 % (95 %CI:28.2 % ~ 87.8 %),PFS率分别为45.0 % (95 %CI:19.4 % ~ 67.8 %)、55.6 % (95 % CI:20.4 % ~ 80.4 %),两者无统计学差异。移植后3年累积复发率为21.6 % (95 %CI:7.5 % ~ 40.4 %),非复发死亡率为29.4 % (95 %CI:12.6 % ~ 48.4 %)。

结论

高危AML/MDS采用CBA预处理方案,移植后复发率较低,总生存期长,安全性良好。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cladribine, busulfan, and cytarabine (CBA) -based intensified conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) .

Methods

Clinical data of AML/MDS patients who underwent CBA-based allo-HSCT at the Department of Hematology, 940th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force from January 2018 to May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Engraftment kinetics, incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infections, relapse rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were summarized. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, while cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality were evaluated by the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Differences between groups were compared using the Log-rank test.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included, with a median age of 35 (range: 6 ~ 52) years including 15 AML cases (including 13 relapsed/refractory AML) and 9 MDS cases. All patients achieved successful neutrophil with median time to engraftment of 18 (13 ~ 22) days. 22 patients achieved successful platelet engraftment with median time to engraftment of 17 (9 ~ 30) days, and 2 patients of poor platelet engraftment function were relieved after treatment. The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were 45.8 % and 16.7 %, respectively. All 24 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after transplantation, with the flow cytometry-confirmed MRD was negative. After a median follow-up of 44.5 (1.5 ~ 84) months, the estimated 3-year OS and PFS rates were 57.8% (95%CI: 35.7%~74.6%) and 48.9% (95%CI: 27.8% ~ 67.0%), respectively. The 3-year OS rates of AML and MDS patients were 52.5% (95%CI: 25.2%~ 73.9%) and 66.7% (95%CI: 28.2%~ 87.8%), while PFS rates were 45.0% (95%CI: 19.4%~ 67.8%) and 55.6% (95%CI: 20.4%~ 80.4%), showing no statistically significant difference. The 3-year cumulative relapse rate and non-relapse mortality were 21.6% (95%CI: 7.5% ~ 40.4%) and 29.4% (95%CI: 12.6%~ 48.4%), respectively.

Conclusion

For high-risk AML/MDS patients, receiving the CBA conditioning regimen demonstrates low relapse rates, prolonged overall survival, and favorable safety profiles post-allo-HSCT.

图1 CBA预处理及GVHD预防方案注:ATG为兔抗人胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白;PBSC为外周血干细胞;BM为骨髓;MTX为甲氨蝶呤
表1 24例AML/MDS患者异基因造血干细胞移植相关资料
表2 aGVHD患者特征[例(%)]
图2 CBA预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗AML/MDS的临床结局分析注:a、b图为CBA预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗AML/MDS的总生存率和无进展生存率;c、d图为CBA预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗AML/MDS的总生存率和无进展生存率比较;e、f图为CBA预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗AML/MDS的的累及复发率和非复发死亡率
1
董珈余,窦颖. 异基因造血干细胞移植后血脂异常的发生机制及防治要点[J]. 器官移植, 2024, 15(6):977-982.
2
Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(22):2091-2101.
3
Yanada M, Konuma T, Yamasaki S, et al. Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation:clinical features and outcomes[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2021, 56(5):1126-1133.
4
Takami A. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Int J Hematol, 2018, 107(5):513-518.
5
Versluis J, Saber W, Tsai HK, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation improves outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome across high-risk genetic subgroups: genetic analysis of the blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network 1102 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(28):4497-4510.
6
Wang L, Gao W, Wang L, et al. Cladribine-based debulking chemotherapy sequential with reduced intensity regimen and post-transplantation maintenance for refractory myeloid leukemia:a prospective phase II clinical trial[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2022, 57(6):1004-1006.
7
Tong X, Li M, Jin J, et al. Cladribine-and decitabine-containing conditioning regimen has a low post-transplant relapse rate in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome[J]. Int J Cancer, 2023, 152(10):2123-2133.
8
中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 成人急性髓系白血病(非急性早幼粒细胞白血病)中国诊疗指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2023, 44(9):705-712.
9
中华医学会血液学分会. 骨髓增生异常综合征中国诊断与治疗指南(2019年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2019, 40(2):89-97.
10
Schoemans HM, Lee SJ, Ferrara JL, et al. EBMT-NIH-CIBMTR Task Force position statement on standardized terminology & guidance for graft-versus-host disease assessment[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2018, 53(11):1401-1415.
11
中华医学会血液学分会干细胞应用学组. 异基因造血干细胞移植患者巨细胞病毒感染管理中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2022, 43(8):617-623.
12
Styczynski J, Reusser P, Einsele H, et al. Management of HSV, VZV and EBV infections in patients with hematological malignancies and after SCT: guidelines from the Second European Conference on Infections in Leukemia[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2009, 43(10):757-770.
13
Robak T, Wierzbowska A. Cladribine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leuk Res, 2014, 38(4):425-427.
14
Kroeger H, Jelinek J, Estécio MR, et al. Aberrant CpG island methylation in acute myeloid leukemia is accentuated at relapse[J]. Blood, 2008, 112(4):1366-1373.
15
Freyer CW, Gupta N, Wetzler M, et al. Revisiting the role of cladribine in acute myeloid leukemia:an improvement on past accomplishments or more old news?[J]. Am J Hematol, 2015, 90(1):62-72.
16
Zhou A, Han Q, Song H, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of cladribine for the treatment of refractory acute myeloid leukemia:a meta-analysis[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2019, 13:1867-1878.
17
Cheng T, Peng J, Liu Y, et al. Cladribine and medium-dose cytarabine intensified busulfan plus cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for adults high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Ann Hematol, 104(7):3753-3762.
18
王晴晴, 夏凌辉. 联合克拉屈滨预处理方案在难治/复发性急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血干细胞移植中的疗效观察[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2021, 29(8):1419-1422.
19
刘苍春, 及月茹, 张静宜, 等. 克拉屈滨联合白消安和阿糖胞苷预用药在异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病中的作用[J]. 中国药物应用与监测, 2024, 21(5):499-503.
20
Gao L, Zhang Y, Wang S, et al. Effect of rhG-CSF combined with decitabine prophylaxis on relapse of patients with high-risk MRD-negative AML after HSCT: an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(36):4249-4259.
21
袁芳芳, 王勇奇, 李明会, 等. MeCBA预处理方案异基因造血干细胞移植挽救性治疗难治/复发急性髓系白血病的单中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2024, 45(5):500-504.
22
中华医学会血液学分会干细胞应用学组. 异基因造血干细胞移植急性移植物抗宿主病诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2024, 45(6):525-533.
23
Kujawska J, Zeiser R, Gil L. Recent advances in acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (aGvHD):aspects of steroid-resistant disease[J]. Ann Hematol, 2025, 104(7):855-865.
24
Xu L, Chen H, Chen J, et al. The consensus on indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematological diseases in China-recommendations from the Chinese Society of Hematology[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2018, 11(1):33.
25
Wang Y, Chen H, Chen J, et al. The consensus on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China[J]. Cancer Lett, 2018, 438:63-75.
[1] 姚丹娜, 肖宇杰, 冯蓉琴, 孙盼盼, 魏莱, 王洪涛. 脂肪干细胞治疗慢性创面优化策略的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(05): 447-451.
[2] 张克俭, 赵建红, 尚培中, 张克勤, 张少斌, 王铁山. 乳腺癌肺转移术后化疗并发骨髓增生异常和Sweet综合征一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 471-472.
[3] 田红娟, 葸瑞, 刘恒, 毛东锋, 吴涛. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗再生障碍性贫血并单克隆免疫球蛋白增多一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 264-267.
[4] 刘恒, 吴涛, 鱼玲玲, 葸瑞, 潘耀柱, 毛东锋, 石亚军, 刘文慧, 田红娟, 王莹, 张晓菲, 张曦. 急性移植物抗宿主病相关特异性血清生物标志物分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 237-242.
[5] 刘麾, 赵鹏, 冯静, 胡晓彦, 杜涛, 王凌云. 三维调强放射治疗对急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后髓外复发的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 110-115.
[6] 张静雯, 刘银, 陈飞, 肖晖, 左学兰, 何莉, 熊蓓, 邵亮, 吴江, 刘明辉, 周怡, 李建芳, 汪聪, 刘红丽, 周芙玲. 脐带血微移植治疗初诊老年急性髓系白血病的开放性、单中心、随机对照临床研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 266-274.
[7] 毛东锋, 姚琳, 吴涛, 刘文慧. 乳腺癌术后合并NUP98-HOXA9基因阳性急性髓系白血病1例临床报告[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 290-292.
[8] 童生莲, 张茜. 异基因造血干细胞移植后感染新冠病毒发生可逆性后部脑病变综合征1 例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 190-192.
[9] 刘洋, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 高铭敏, 吴秋月, 梁丽霞. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗伴复杂染色体核型的粒细胞肉瘤1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 109-111.
[10] 王向丽, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 刘恒, 刘文慧, 周芮, 田红娟. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗ANKRD26相关性血小板减少症1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 236-238.
[11] 杜鑫, 刘霞霞, 张恬波, 张夏林, 杨林花, 张睿娟. AHNAK基因高表达与老年急性髓系白血病患者预后不良相关[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 204-211.
[12] 刘洋, 吴涛, 刘恒, 刘文慧, 田红娟, 周芮, 高铭敏, 王向丽, 张睿. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗CSF3R基因突变急性髓系白血病M2型1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 90-92.
[13] 张艺, 任秀君, 郭孟玮, 赵雅芳, 李一凡, 李佳阳, 任晓暄, 邬继红, 卢海洋. 电针预处理对脑缺血再灌注大鼠行为学及外周血内皮祖细胞的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 71-77.
[14] 李杨春雪, 高杰, 郭文治, 刘智. 远端缺血预处理器官保护与年龄相关性差异研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1150-1154.
[15] 张滕, 陶艳玲. Shwachman-Diamond综合征继发骨髓增生异常综合征一例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 178-182.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?