切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 329 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2025.06.002

论著

MHC不相合与H-2单倍体相合造血干细胞移植建立急性移植物抗宿主病小鼠模型的研究
郑学真1,2, 雷关芝3, 张晓月1,2, 姜一帆1,2, 王兆朋2, 王丹丹1,2, 张月英1,2, 周芳3,(), 吴志成4,()   
  1. 1250117 济南,山东第一医科大学附属第一医院病理科
    2250117 济南,山东第一医科大学临床与基础医学院病理生理学系
    3250031 济南,联勤保障部队解放军960医院血液病科
    4250117 济南,济南市疾病预防控制中心职业与放射卫生监督研究室
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-17 出版日期:2025-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周芳, 吴志成
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发项目(2022YFF0713100); 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2022MH135)

Study on the mouse model of acute graft-versus-host disease after MHC-mismatched and H-2 haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Xuezhen Zheng1,2, Guanzhi Lei3, Xiaoyue Zhang1,2, Yifan Jiang1,2, Zhaopeng Wang2, Dandan Wang1,2, Yueying Zhang1,2, Fang Zhou3,(), Zhicheng Wu4,()   

  1. 1Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250117, China
    2Department of Pathophysiology, School of Clinical and Basic Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250117, China
    3Department of Hematology, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China
    4Institute of Occupational and Radiological Health Supervision Laboratory, Jinan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250117, China
  • Received:2024-12-17 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Fang Zhou, Zhicheng Wu
引用本文:

郑学真, 雷关芝, 张晓月, 姜一帆, 王兆朋, 王丹丹, 张月英, 周芳, 吴志成. MHC不相合与H-2单倍体相合造血干细胞移植建立急性移植物抗宿主病小鼠模型的研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 329-338.

Xuezhen Zheng, Guanzhi Lei, Xiaoyue Zhang, Yifan Jiang, Zhaopeng Wang, Dandan Wang, Yueying Zhang, Fang Zhou, Zhicheng Wu. Study on the mouse model of acute graft-versus-host disease after MHC-mismatched and H-2 haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(06): 329-338.

目的

建立H-2单倍体相合造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)与主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)不相合异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)小鼠模型,观察造血干细胞移植后不同器官病理变化,为机制研究奠定基础。

方法

通过给予受鼠8 Gy剂量的60Coγ射线为预处理方案,以雄性C57BL /6 (H-2Kb)为供鼠,雌性BALB /C为受鼠,2 h内尾静脉回输200 μL骨髓细胞(5 × 106/只)和脾脏单核细胞(1 × 107/只)混悬液,构建MHC不相合allo- HSCT后aGVHD动物模型。相同预处理条件下,以父代雄性C57BL /6 (H-2Kb)为供鼠,雌性[C57BL/6 × BALB/C]F1 (H-2Kb/d)为受鼠的haplo-HSCT后aGVHD动物模型,2 h内尾静脉回输等量细胞;将两种受鼠分为TBI组(单纯全身照射组),全身照射+干细胞移植组(aGVHD模型组),分别设同周龄健康鼠作为对照。观察小鼠生存率、临床评分和体质量变化;HE染色观察器官(肺脏、肝脏、脾脏、肾脏、皮肤、肠)的病理学改变,两组间比较采用独立样本t检验,多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验。

结果

与对照组相比,两组aGVHD模型均出现生存率降低、临床评分[(6.18 ± 0.23比0)、(5.14 ± 0.38比0)分]增高、体重下降明显,器官病理损伤严重;两组单纯照射小鼠出现食欲下降且活动明显减少,但是未出现典型的aGVHD表现;且与TBI相比,aGVHD组临床评分[(6.18 ± 0.23)比(1.82 ± 0.11)、(5.14 ± 0.38)比(1.45 ± 0.23)分]升高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);与MHC不相合aGVHD组小鼠相比,haplo-HSCT后aGVHD组小鼠病理学观察发现器官损伤较轻,肾脏、皮肤病理评分[(3.67 ± 0.32)比(2.60 ± 0.25)、(7.50 ± 0.38)比(6.00 ± 0.32)分]升高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。肺脏、肝脏、脾脏、肠病理评分比较差异无统计学意义,但haplo-HSCT后aGVHD组小鼠生存时间延长。

结论

研究表明,以TBI为预处理方案,以C57BL /6 (H-2b)为供鼠,BALB/C与CB6F1 (H-2b/d)为受鼠,均可稳定构建aGVHD模型,MHC不相合HSCT与haplo-HSCT相比,免疫排斥与器官损伤更为严重。

Objective

Establish the mouse models of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after H-2 haploidentical (haplo-HSCT) and MHC incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and observe the pathological changes of different organs after HSCT, laying a foundation for mechanism research.

Methods

By administering the recipient mice with a dose of 8 Gy dose of 60Coγ rays as the pretreatment protocol, using male C57BL/6 (H-2Kb) as the donor mice and female BALB /C (H-2Kd) as the recipient mice, 200 μL of suspension of bone marrow cells (5 × 106/ mouse) and spleen monocytes (1 × 107/ mouse) was reinfused via the tail vein within 2 hours to construct an animal model of aGVHD after allo-HSCT with MHC mismatch. Under the same pretreatment conditions, male C57BL/6 (H-2Kb) was used as the donor mouse and female[C57BL/6 × BALB/C]F1 (H-2K b/d) was used as the recipient mouse, and 200 μL of bone marrow cells (5 × 106/ mouse) and spleen monocytes (1 × 107/ mouse) were infused back into the tail vein within 2 hours to construct an animal model of aGVHD after haplo-HSCT. The two recipients were divided into TBI group, TBI plus allo-HSCT group (aGVHD model group). The two groups were given healthy mice of the same age as controls. The survival rate, clinical score and body mass changes of mice were observed, the pathological changes of organs (lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, skin and intestines) were observed by HE staining. Data analysis was conducted using the independent samples t-test for inter-group comparisons. One-way analysis of variance was used for comparison between multiple groups, and LSD-t test was used for pairwise comparison between groups.

Results

Compared with the healthy control group, the survival rate and body weight in both two aGVHD groups were decreased significantly, while the clinical score were increased (6.18 ± 0.23 vs 0, 5.14 ± 0.38 vs 0), and the pathological damage of organs was severe (P < 0.01). The mice in two TBI groups showed a decreased in appetite and activity, but did not have typical aGVHD manifestations. Compared with the TBI group, the clinical score of the aGVHD group was significantly higher (6.18 ± 0.23 vs 1.82 ± 0.11, 5.14 ± 0.38 vs 1.45 ± 0.23). Compared with the mice in the MHC-incompatible aGVHD group, the pathological observation of mice in the aGVHD group after haplo-HSCT showed that the organ damage was mild, the difference in kidney and skin were statistically significant (3.67 ± 0.32 vs 2.60 ± 0.25, 7.50 ± 0.38 vs 6.00 ± 0.32), while the difference in lung, liver, spleen and intestines was not statistically significant, and the survival time of mice in the aGVHD group was prolonged after haplo-HSCT.

Conclusion

Using TBI as the pretreatment regimen, C57BL/6 (H-2b) as the donor mouse, BALB/C and CB6F1 (H-2b/d) as the recipient mouse, the aGVHD model could be stably constructed, and the immune rejection and organ damage were more severe in MHC incompatible HSCT compared with haplo-HSCT.

表1 aGVHD的临床评分标准
图1 构建MHC不相合造血干细胞移植aGVHD小鼠模型注:a图为aGVHD模型小鼠典型图像;b图为各组BALB/C小鼠体质量百分比;c图为aGVHD临床评分折线图,d图为各组aGVHD平均临床评分对比;e图为组间生存率对比;***P < 0.001
图2 构建H-2单倍体相合相合造血干细胞移植aGVHD小鼠模型注:a图为aGVHD模型小鼠典型图像;b图为各组CB6F1小鼠体质量百分比;c图为aGVHD临床评分折线图;d图为各组aGVHD平均临床评分对比;e图为组间生存率对比;***P < 0.001
图3 比较MHC不相和H-2单倍体相合造血干细胞移植aGVHD表现注:a图为两组aGVHD模型小鼠生存率分析;b图为两组aGVHD模型小鼠体质量百分比;c图为两组aGVHD模型小鼠临床评分折线图,d图为两组aGVHD模型小鼠临床评分柱状分析图;*P < 0.05
图4 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠肺组织病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察肺组织病理变化;b ~ d图为各组病理评分对比;***P < 0.001,ns为差异无统计学意义
图5 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠肝组织病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察肝组织病理变化;b ~ d图为各组病理评分对比;*** P < 0.001,ns为差异无统计学意义
图6 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠脾组织病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察脾组织病理变化;b ~ d图为各组病理评分对比;*P < 0.05,*** P < 0.001,ns为差异无统计学意义
图7 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠肾组织病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察肾组织病理变化;b ~ d图为各组病理评分对比;*P < 0.05,*** P < 0.001
图8 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠皮肤病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察皮肤组织病理变化;b ~ d图为各组病理评分对比;* P < 0.05,*** P < 0.001
图9 光学显微镜下观察造血干细胞移植后各组小鼠肠组织病理(×200)注:a图为HE染色观察皮肤组织病理变化(比例尺100 μm);b图为病理评分统计学结果;*** P < 0.001,ns为差异无统计学意义
1
Baden LR, Swaminathan S, Almyroudis NG, et al. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections, version 3.2024, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(9):617-644.
2
Xu LP, Lu PH, Wu DP, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity in China 2022-2023. The proportions of peripheral blood for stem cell source continue to grow: A report from the Chinese blood and marrow transplantation registry group[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2025, 60(2):255.
3
Hill GR, Betts BC, Tkachev V, et al. Current concepts and advances in graft-versus-host disease immunology[J]. Annu Rev Immunol, 2021, 39(1):19-49.
4
Ghimire S, Weber D, Mavin E, et al. Pathophysiology of GvHD and other HSCT-related major complications[J]. Front Immunol, 2017, 8:79.
5
Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ. Immune reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2014, 20(4):440-449.
6
Kanakry CG, Fuchs EJ, Luznik L. Modern approaches to HLA-haploidentical blood or marrow transplantation[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2016, 13(1):10-24.
7
Lv M, Huang XJ. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: where we are and where to go[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2012, 5:10.
8
Cooke KR, Kobzik L, Martin TR, et al. An experimental model of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome after bone marrow transplantation: I. The roles of minor H antigens and endotoxin[J]. Blood, 1996, 88(8):3230-3239.
9
Liu Y, Zhang L, Wu Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of TACI-Ig on collagen-induced arthritis by regulating T and B lymphocytes function in DBA/1 mice[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2011, 654(3):304-314.
10
Scheurer J, Leithäuser F, Debatin KM, et al. Modeling acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in murine bone marrow transplantation (BMT) models with MHC disparity[J]. Methods Cell Biol, 2022, 168:19-39.
11
Shi M, Zeng X, Guo F, et al. Anti-inflammatory pyranochalcone derivative attenuates lps-induced acute kidney injury via inhibiting tlr4/nf-κb pathway[J]. Molecules, 2017, 22(10):1683.
12
Anderson BE, McNiff J, Yan J, et al. Memory CD4+ T cells do not induce graft-versus-host disease[J]. J Clin Invest, 2003, 112(1):101-108.
13
Kaplan DH, Anderson BE, McNiff JM, et al. Target antigens determine graft-versus-host disease phenotype. The journal of immunology[J]. J Immunol, 2004, 173(9):5467-5475.
14
Penack O, Marchetti M, Ruutu T, et al. Prophylaxis and management of graft versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: Updated consensus recommendations of the european society for blood and marrow transplantation[J]. Lancet Haematol, 2020, 7(2):e157-e167.
15
Zhang A, Xiong Y, Xu F, et al. IL-1β enhances human placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells ability to mediate Th1/Th2 and Th1/CD4+ IL-10+ T cell balance and regulates its adhesion, proliferation and migration via PD-L1[J]. Cell Immunol, 2020, 352:104113.
16
Malard F, Holler E, Sandmaier BM, et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2023, 9(1):27.
17
Talley S, Rademacher DJ, Campbell EM. Inflammasome activation occurs in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during graft-versus-host disease[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2023, 14(9):632.
18
Li H, Liu Q, Gao X, et al. IFN-γ gene loaded human umbilical mesenchymal stromal cells targeting therapy for Graft-versus-host disease[J]. Int J Pharm, 2021, 592:120058.
19
张倩, 鹿迎雪, 薛超, 等. TBI与BU/CY两种预处理方案建立急性移植物抗宿主病小鼠模型的比较[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2022, 30(4):1248-1254.
20
Su Y, Sun X, Liu X, et al. hUC-EVs-ATO reduce the severity of acute GVHD by resetting inflammatory macrophages toward the M2 phenotype[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2022, 15(1):99.
21
Miyata M, Matsuki E, Ichikawa K, et al. Allogeneic T cells cause acute renal injury after hematopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Blood Adv, 2023, 7(22):6936-6948.
22
Koyama M, Hippe DS, Srinivasan S, et al. Intestinal microbiota controls graft-versus-host disease independent of donor-host genetic disparity[J]. Immunity, 2023, 56(8):1876-1893.
23
Zhang XH, Zhou Y, Zhang JM, et al. IL-35 inhibits acute graft-versus-host disease in a mouse model[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2015, 29(2):383-392.
24
Shahin K, Mattar Z, Silveira P, et al. Bone marrow graft-versus-host disease in major histocompatibility complex-matched murine reduced-intensity allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2017, 101(11):2695-2704.
[1] 王天艺, 李筝, 许锐. 激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性早期乳腺癌的新辅助治疗[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 352-357.
[2] 刘军, 周欢欢, 刘晓静, 沈丽, 沈丰, 吴红伟. 曲安奈德治疗肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的病理学改变[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 302-304.
[3] 阮希伦, 单臻, 范远键, 林颖, 王深明, 龙健婷, 徐向东. 一项妊娠相关性乳腺癌病理学特征、治疗方案及预后信息的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 340-344.
[4] 王达, 朱建敏. 血小板/淋巴细胞计数比值对乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的预测效能[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 650-653.
[5] 林炳涛, 陈君填. 不同病理类型进展期胃癌患者临床特征及腹腔镜辅助根治术后短期预后的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 429-433.
[6] 刘恒, 吴涛, 潘耀柱, 白海, 毛东锋, 田红娟, 石亚军, 葸瑞. CBA预处理方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 283-289.
[7] 毛东锋, 姚琳, 吴涛, 刘文慧. 乳腺癌术后合并NUP98-HOXA9基因阳性急性髓系白血病1例临床报告[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 290-292.
[8] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[9] 杨刚, 黄徐建, 朱建交, 熊永福, 李敬东. 两种不同类型肝门周围胆管癌临床病理特征及生存预后[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 931-938.
[10] 黄超, 张佳茂, 孔艺洁, 刘玙寒, 苏彤, 方路, 梁博, 郑文娟. 组织病理分型在壶腹周围癌化疗方案制定中作用的文献综述[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 795-801.
[11] 崔滨, 王丹慧, 王林, 陈国强. Treg细胞在神经病理性疼痛中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 303-308.
[12] 胡斌, 柳林. 食管癌新辅助治疗后CT影像特征变化与术后病理完全缓解率的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 627-634.
[13] 俞若婷, 高威, 刘宇浩, 刘琛. 肺挫伤病理生理机制及相关治疗研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 536-543.
[14] 王春茂, 韩鸣, 王子彤. 局限期小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗后完全病理学缓解五例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 550-554.
[15] 宁雯琪, 张永利. 脓毒症心肌病的研究进展:基础、临床与展望[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 461-466.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?