切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 193 -200. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2026.04.001

论著

大块组织块法分离培养人脐带间充质干细胞的可行性研究
刘丽丽, 高笑微, 张志华()   
  1. 067000 承德,承德医学院附属医院血液内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-02 出版日期:2026-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张志华

A feasibility study on the isolation and culture of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells by the large tissue block method

Lili Liu, Xiaowei Gao, Zhihua Zhang()   

  1. Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, China
  • Received:2025-12-02 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhihua Zhang
引用本文:

刘丽丽, 高笑微, 张志华. 大块组织块法分离培养人脐带间充质干细胞的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 193-200.

Lili Liu, Xiaowei Gao, Zhihua Zhang. A feasibility study on the isolation and culture of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells by the large tissue block method[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(04): 193-200.

目的

探讨大块组织块贴壁培养法在人脐带间充质干细胞(hUC-MSCs)体外分离培养及规模化制备中的应用价值。

方法

采用该法分离培养hUC-MSCs,通过倒置相差显微镜观察细胞形态与生长状态、CCK-8法检测细胞增殖活性、成骨/成软骨诱导分化实验验证多向分化潜能、流式细胞术检测细胞表面标志物。大块组织块法与传统贴壁法在细胞收获量及各时间点吸光度(A)值上的组间差异采用独立样本t检验。

结果

与传统贴壁法相比,大块组织块法的hUC-MSCs细胞收获量(1.5 × 106比1.0 × 106个/皿)更高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两种方法获得的细胞增殖活性相当,倍增时间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。培养5 d见细胞迁移,6 ~ 10 d成纤维样细胞迁出,2周融合率超80 %;P3代细胞增殖活性优,表面标志物符合国际标准,且具备成骨、成软骨分化能力。

结论

该方法操作简便、高效低损,可获得高纯度、高活性hUC-MSCs,具有良好推广价值。

Objective

To explore the application value of the adherent culture method of large tissue blocks in the in vitro isolation, culture and large-scale preparation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs).

Methods

The large tissue block method was used to isolate and culture hUC-MSCs. Cell morphology and growth status were observed by an inverted phase-contrast microscope. Cell proliferation was detected using the CCK-8 assay. Multidirectional differentiation potential was assessed through osteogenic/chondrogenic induction experiments. Cell surface markers were identified using flow cytometry.

Results

Compared with the traditional adherent culture method, the harvest of hUC-MSCs was higher by the large tissue block method (1.5 × 106 cells/dish vs 1.0 × 106 cells/dish), with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The proliferative activity of cells obtained by both methods was comparable, and there was no statistically significant difference in doubling time (P > 0.05). Cell migration was observed after 5 days of culture, fibroblast-like cells migrated out from 6 to 10 days, and the fusion rate exceeded 80 % after 2 weeks. The proliferation activity of P3 generation cells was excellent, the surface markers met international standards, and they had the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and chondrocytes.

Conclusion

The large tissue block method is simple to operate, highly efficient and low-loss, could obtain high-purity and high-activity hUC-MSCs, with good promotion value.

图1 倒置生物显微镜下观察人脐带间充质干细胞分离培养及传代过程中的形态学观察注:a图为大块组织块法接种后贴壁培养状态;b图为培养第5天少量梭形细胞从组织块迁出(×40);c图为培养第8天细胞进入快速增殖期,形成细胞集落(×40);d图为培养第12天原代细胞局部汇合度达80%~ 90 % (×40);e图为第3代(P3)细胞形态(×40);f图为第3代(P3)细胞形态(×100);g图为第5代(P5)细胞形态(×40);h图为第10代(P10)细胞形态(×40);i图为第15代(P15)细胞形态(×40)
图2 大块组织块法分离培养的P3 hUC-MSCs表面标志物表达流式检测结果注:a ~ n图分别为PE-A、FITC-A、V500-A、APC-A、PerCP-A、APC-Cy7-A、CD14-FITC、CD45-V500、CD11b-APC、CD34-PerCP、HLA-DR-APC-Cy7、CD105-PE、CD73-PE、CD90-FITC通道检测结果。其中CD90 (99.44%)、CD73 (99.06%)、CD105 (98.24%)高表达,CD34 (0.05%)、CD45 (1.42%)、CD11b (2.50%)、CD14及HLA-DR (0.09%)低表达,符合间充质干细胞表型特征
图3 倒置生物显微镜下观察hUC-MSCs的体外成骨与成软骨分化能力鉴定注:a图为成骨诱导第5天,细胞体积增大呈短梭形;b图为成骨诱导第8天,细胞形态转变为多角形,细胞质内颗粒增多;c图为成骨诱导第15天,茜素红染色显示钙化结节呈特征性红色(×40);d图为成骨诱导茜素红染色第15天(×100);e图为成软骨诱导培养后,细胞聚集形成圆润光滑的细胞球;f图为诱导21 d后细胞球的石蜡切片,阿利新蓝染色显示细胞质呈蓝色(×40);g图为观察阿利新蓝染色结果,细胞质呈蓝色(×100)。分化染色以未诱导的hUC-MSCs作为阴性对照,阴性对照未见特异性染色
图4 两种培养方法下人脐带间充质干细胞的增殖特性比较注:a图为大块组织块法与传统贴壁法获得的hUC-MSCs单皿收获量对比,****P < 0.0001;b图为两种培养方法下hUC-MSCs的体外相对增殖曲线(CCK-8法),每组设n = 5个技术复孔,显示随培养时间延长,两种方法的细胞均呈稳定增殖趋势;c图为对数生长期(3 ~ 9 d)的增殖曲线及指数拟合结果,增殖速率常数k的95%置信区间完全重叠,二者增殖速率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)
1
Bian D, Wu Y, Song G, et al. The application of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their derivative exosome in skin wound healing:a comprehensive review[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2022,13(1):24.
2
Samsonraj RM, Raghunath M, Nurcombe V, et al. Concise review: multifaceted characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells for use in regenerative medicine[J]. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2017,6(12):2173-2185.
3
Chu DT, Phuong TNT, Tien NLB, et al. An update on the progress of isolation, culture, storage, and clinical application of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(3):708.
4
张文瑾,孙建军.人脂肪间充质干细胞的分离及培养和鉴定[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 30(9):726-729.
5
Yang Y, Zhang C, Sheng X. Isolation and culture of three kinds of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells[J]. J Vis Exp, 2022:186.
6
Teoh PL, Mohd Akhir H, Abdul Ajak W, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells derived from perinatal tissues:sources, characteristics and isolation methods[J]. Malays J Med Sci, 2023, 30(2):55-68.
7
Nagamura-Inoue T, He H. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells:their advantages and potential clinical utility[J]. World J Stem Cells, 2014, 6(2):195-202.
8
Biswas A, Rajasekaran R, Saha B, et al. Human placenta/umbilical cord derivatives in regenerative medicine-prospects and challenges[J]. Biomater Sci, 2023, 11(14):4789-4821.
9
张德双, 陈娟. 人脐带间充质干细胞的体外获取、鉴定及标记[J]. 华西医学, 2015, 30(11):2067-2070.
10
陈凤, 杨敏, 李彦洁, 等.人脐带间充质干细胞的分离培养及多向分化潜能研究[J]. 生物学杂志, 2021, 38(5):82-85, 90.
11
Zhu Z, Zhang Q, Liu L, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells' cultivation and treatmentof liver diseases[J]. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther, 2023, 18(3): 286-298.
12
张飞, 王一雄, 武忠炎, 等.人脐带间充质干细胞生物特性比较:胰酶冷消化和组织块法体外培养[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(41):6614-6619.
13
Mushahary D, Spittler A, Kasper C, et al. Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Cytometry A, 2018, 93(1):19-31.
14
Xu M, Xu J, Cheng D, et al. Isolation of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells with high yields and low damage[J]. J Vis Exp, 2024, 209.
15
Mori Y, Ohshimo J, Shimazu T, et al. Improved explant method to isolate umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their immunosuppressive properties[J]. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2015, 21(4):367-372.
16
Tong CK, Vellasamy S, Chong Tan B, et al. Generation of mesenchymal stem cell from human umbilical cord tissue using a combination enzymatic and mechanical disassociation method[J]. Cell Biol Int, 2011, 35(3):221-226.
17
殷瀚, 吴江, 严子能, 等. 基于低温沉积打印技术构建分级多孔脱细胞华通胶支架[J]. 中国医药生物技术, 2022, 17(6):488-496.
18
Zhang H, Zhang B, Tao Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from whole human umbilical cord applying a single enzyme approach[J]. Cell Biochem Funct, 2012, 30(8):643-649.
19
Vis MAM, Ito K, Hofmann S. Impact of culture medium on cellular interactions in in vitro co-culture systems[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8:911.
20
Meesuk L, Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, et al. Osteogenic differentiation and proliferation potentials of human bone marrow and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells on the 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):19509.
21
Athiel Y, Cariot L, Jouannic JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in fetal ovine myelomeningocele repair[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2024, 15(1):444.
22
Dao TTT, Nguyen CTH, Vu NB, et al. Evaluation of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in porous scaffolds[M]//Pham PV. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine:Vol. 1084. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2019:207-220.
23
Yang J, Chen Z, Pan D, et al. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes combined pluronic F127 hydrogel promote chronic diabetic wound healing and complete skin regeneration[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15:5911-5926.
24
Yang Y, Liu Q, Deng S, et al. Human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing HO-1 attenuate neural injury and enhance functional recovery by inhibiting inflammation in stroke mice[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2024 ,30(2):e14412.
25
Gu C, Du W, Chai M, et al. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells affect urea synthesis and the cell apoptosis of human induced hepatocytes by secreting IL-6 in a serum-free co-culture system[J]. Biotechnol J, 2022, 17(1):e2100096.
[1] 刘晓虹, 杨浩鸣, 郑璇儿, 杨淑梅, 杨杰. 人脐带间充质干细胞对耐亚胺培南铜绿假单胞菌生长的抑制作用[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 94-97.
[2] 郑璇儿, 杨杰, 穆小萍, 赖卫明, 许芳, 刘晓虹, 杨浩鸣, 杨淑梅. 人脐带间充质干细胞对耐亚胺培南铜绿假单胞菌耐药性形成的影响[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(02): 248-253.
[3] 周威, 叶啟发. 人脐带间充质干细胞在肝损伤中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 323-326.
[4] 刘丽丽, 王玮, 张志华. 人脐带间充质干细胞治疗神经系统疾病的机制及研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 368-373.
[5] 曾伟杰, 廖延, 胡樾, 胡隽源, 曾桂芳, 傅泽钦, 伍世铎, 梁晓, 谢长峰, 刘沐芸. 冻存前后人脐带间充质干细胞对T和B淋巴细胞免疫抑制能力的差异比较[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 200-206.
[6] 赵琳, 张涛, 迟静薇, 李勇, 王韵阳, 吕文山, 王伟, 王颜刚. 人脐带间充质干细胞对1型糖尿病鼠肝脏损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(01): 18-22.
[7] 陈奇, 孙翊夫, 吕晓霞, 张福强, 顾锐, 高旭, 邵立伟, 姜金兰. 人脐带间充质干细胞移植治疗脊髓损伤的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(04): 229-233.
[8] 马剑波, 许浩, 陈一笑. 人脐带间充质干细胞来源外泌体对脑出血后炎症反应和神经损伤的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 280-289.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?