切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 103 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2020.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

国产西罗莫司与原研品在体内外对细胞影响的比较实验
马麟麟1,(), 谢林2, 黄霞2, 徐炳洋2, 陈刚2   
  1. 1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院泌尿外科;移植耐受与器官保护北京市重点实验室
    2. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学附属同济医院器官移植研究所
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-29 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马麟麟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81372737)

Comparison the effects of domestic sirolimus and the original product on the cells in vitro and in vivo

Linlin Ma1,(), Lin Xie2, Xia Huang2, Bingyang Xu2, Gang Chen2   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Benjing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Tolerance Induction and Organ Protection in Transplantation, Beijing 100050, China
    2. Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tomgji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2019-09-29 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Linlin Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Linlin, Email:
引用本文:

马麟麟, 谢林, 黄霞, 徐炳洋, 陈刚. 国产西罗莫司与原研品在体内外对细胞影响的比较实验[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 103-109.

Linlin Ma, Lin Xie, Xia Huang, Bingyang Xu, Gang Chen. Comparison the effects of domestic sirolimus and the original product on the cells in vitro and in vivo[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(02): 103-109.

目的

探讨国产西罗莫司与原研品对移植宿主外周血中免疫细胞的影响效果。

方法

体外实验:人膀胱癌T24细胞体外培养,分别加入国产西罗莫司和原研品,CKK-8法检测并比较细胞增殖活性受抑制的情况。体内实验:建立小鼠异位心脏移植模型,设立对照无手术组(对照组)、移植无治疗组(Tx组)、移植+国产西罗莫司组(Tx+YXK组)、移植+原研品组(Tx+RAPA组)。观察移植心脏搏动情况,受者脾脏的流式细胞学检测,以及脾脏及移植物中免疫细胞浸润的病理检查。流式细胞检测树突状细胞(DC),CD8+细胞和调节性T细胞(Treg),病理组织学检测及免疫组化染色比较两组免疫细胞浸润情况。两组间比较采用独立样本t检验,多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用LSD-t检验。

结果

体外实验结果显示,国产西罗莫司与原研品对T24细胞活力影响的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。体内实验结果显示,Tx组移植心脏于第7天停止搏动,Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组在第10天心脏搏动仍有力、节律正常。(1)脾脏流式细胞检测显示,与对照组、Tx组比较,Tx+RAPA组、Tx+YXK组CD11c+I-A+CD86+DC细胞(15.88±4.73、22.90±3.86比4.51±1.57、5.40±2.54)、CD8+淋巴细胞数量(6.32±0.98、6.75±1.34比3.03±1.12、3.23±0.97)均降低,而Tx+RAPA组CD4+CD25+Foxp3+阳性细胞数量(15.06±3.42比7.87±1.95,10.88±2.08)升高(P均< 0.05)。Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组3种免疫细胞数量差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。(2)移植心脏病理免疫细胞组化染色灰度分析,Tx组、Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组CD4,CD8,IDO和CD11b数量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),与Tx组比较,Tx+RAPA组和Tx+YXK组CD11c (25143.52±3525.12比12936.30±766.94、14240.60±3124.67)、Foxp3阳性细胞浸润数量(500.78±238.33比46.05±68.16、49.22±25.82)降低(P均< 0.05),Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。(3)模型动物脾脏病理免疫细胞组化染色灰度分析,Tx组CD 4和CD8阳性细胞浸润数量较Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组少,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),Tx+YXK组和Tx+RAPA组比较,各种细胞染色的IOD值差异均无统计学意义。

结论

使用国产西罗莫司与原研品两种药物后受者移植心脏和脾脏中的细胞浸润变化一致;在体外对细胞增殖、移植后抗排斥作用和体内免疫细胞的影响表现均一致。

Objective

To investigate the effect of domestic sirolimus (yixinke) and the original product Rapamycin on the cytology of transplanted host in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

T24 cells were cultured in vitro, and Yixinke and Rapamycin were treated respectively. The cell proliferation was rate assessed by CKK-8 kit. An in vivo model of heterotopic heart transplantation in mice was established, and the mice were divided into a control group (without surgery) , a transplantation group (Tx group without therapy) , Yixinke treatment group (Tx+YXK group) and Rapamycin treatment group (Tx+RAPA group) . Beating of the transplanted heart, the composition of the recipient's spleen cells, and infiltration of immune cells into the spleen and the grafts were monitored. The main immune cells detected by flow cytometry were dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells and regulatory T cells. Histopathological examination, immunohistochemical staining and gray level difference analysis were used to compare the infiltration of immune cells between the two treatment groups. The ANOVA and two-independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

In vitro experiments showed that the effect of domestic sirolimus on the proliferation of T24 cells was the same as that of the original product (P > 0.05) . In vivo experiments showed that the beating of the transplanted heart in the Tx group stopped on the 7th day, and in the Tx+YXK group and Tx+ RAPA group, the beating of the transplanted heart was still normal and strong on the 10th day. (1) Flow cytometric analysis of spleen revealed that compared with the control group and Tx group, the number of CD11c+I- A+CD86+DC cells and CD8+ lymphocytes (15.88±4.73, 22.90±3.86 vs 4.51±1.57, 5.40±2.54, 6.32±0.98, 6.75±1.34 vs 3.03±1.12, 3.23±0.97) in Tx+RAPA group and Tx+YXK group were all decreased (P < 0.05) , and the number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ positive cells in the Tx+ RAPA group increased (P < 0.05) . There was no significant difference in the number of CD11c+I-A+CD86+DC, CD8+ lymphocytes, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells between Tx+YXK group and Tx+Rapa group (P > 0.05) . (2) According to immunohistochemical staining and gray level difference analysis for the transplanted heart, there was no significant difference in the number of CD4, CD8, Ido and CD11b between Tx group, Tx+YXK group and Tx+Rapa group (P > 0.05) . Compared with Tx group, the number of CD11c and Foxp3 positive cells infiltrated in Tx+RAPA group and Tx+YXK group (25143.52±3525.12 vs 12936.30±766.94, 14240.60±3124.67, 500.78±238.33 vs 46.05±68.16, 49.22±25.82) was lower. There was no significant difference between Tx+YXK group and Tx+Rapa group (P > 0.05) . (3) Immunohistochemical staining and gray level difference analysis for the spleen of the model mice showed that the number of CD4 and CD8 positive cells infiltrated in the Tx group was less than that in the Tx+YXK group and Tx+RAPA group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) . Between the Tx+YXK group and Tx+Rapa group, the difference of IOD value of various cell staining was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our results showed that cell infiltration into the transplanted heart and spleen in the Yixinke and conventional drug treatment groups was similar. The effects of Yixinke and the conventional drug on cell proliferation in vitro, anti-rejection following transplantation and immune cells in vivo were all similar.

表1 两种西罗莫司对T24细胞活力影响的比较( ± sn = 5)
图1 各组脾脏大小比较
表2 不同组心脏移植后脾脏流式细胞分析(﹪, ± sn = 5)
图2 光学显微镜下观察各组移植后心脏内心肌组织形态(HE染色,×100)
图3 光学显微镜下观察各组移植心脏不同免疫细胞的组化染色(×200)
表3 移植心脏病理免疫细胞组化染色灰度分析[IOD (SUM), ± sn = 3]
表4 模型动物脾脏病理免疫细胞组化染色灰度分析[IOD (SUM), ± sn = 3]
图4 光学显微镜下观察各组移植脾脏不同免疫细胞的组化染色(×200)
[1]
中华医学会器官移植学分会.中国肾移植受者哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华器官移植杂志[J], 2017, 38(7):430-435.
[2]
杨晓勇, 姚庆春, 胡小鹏. 雷帕霉素体外预处理树突细胞调节Treg/Th17细胞诱导小鼠移植免疫耐受[J].中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(30): 2469-3473.
[3]
张青, 周翠冰, 王城军, 等. 西罗莫司对异种动脉补片移植后的免疫调节作用研究[J]. 器官移植, 2018, 9(3):181-187.
[4]
朱兰, 丁韬, 王莜啸, 等. 肾移植受者西罗莫司联合小剂量环孢素转换治疗的五年临床观察[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(20):1556-1561.
[5]
Watson AR, Dai H, Diaz-Perez JA, et al. mTORC2 deficiency in cutaneous dendritic cells potentiates CD8+ effector T cell responses and accelerates skin graft rejection[J]. Am J Transplant, 2019, 19(3):646-661.
[6]
国务院办公厅. 关于改革完善仿制药供应保障及使用政策的意见[EB/OL].(2018-4-3)[2019-9-29].

URL    
[7]
Hackstein H, Taner T, Zahorchak AF, et al. Rapamycin inhibits IL-4-induced dendritic cell maturation in vitro and dendritic cell mobilization and function in vivo[J]. Blood, 2003, 101(11):4457-4463.
[8]
Hock BD, Mackenzie KA, Cross NB, et al. Renal transplant recipients have elevated frequencies of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2012, 27(1):402-410.
[9]
陈慰峰. 医学免疫学[M].3版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014:8-10.
[10]
Song J, Du G, Chen W, et al. The advantage of Sirolimus in amplifying regulatory B cells and regulatory T cells in liver transplant patients[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2020, 869:172872.
[1] 周容, 张亚萍, 廖宇, 程晓萍, 管玉龙, 潘广玉, 闫杰, 王贤芝, 苟中山, 潘登科, 李巅远. 超声在基因编辑猪-猴异种并联式心脏移植术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 617-623.
[2] 刘欢, 邢皓, 常正奇, 张记. 机械敏感性离子通道蛋白Piezo1在感染相关疾病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 263-269.
[3] 张伟, 孙浩亮. 心脏移植术后继发带状疱疹致Ogilvie综合征一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 239-241.
[4] 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肝脏移植学分会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肾脏移植学分会, 中国医药生物技术协会生物诊断技术分会. 免疫细胞功能状态量化检测评估与临床应用专家共识[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 65-73.
[5] 潘裕华, 李锐钊, 刘菊娥, 曾英彤, 钟诗龙, 赖伟华. 心脏移植术后急性肾损伤再发低血药浓度他克莫司致慢性肾毒性一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 40-44.
[6] 曹飞, 庞俊. 前列腺癌免疫微环境中免疫抑制性细胞分类及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 121-125.
[7] 王大伟, 陆雅斐, 皇甫少华, 陈玉婷, 陈澳, 江滨. 间充质干细胞通过调控免疫机制促进创面愈合的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 361-366.
[8] 梅杰, 徐瑞, 蔡芸, 朱一超. 纤维化对肿瘤浸润免疫细胞的影响——“硬冷肿瘤”的形成[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 257-263.
[9] 曹守青, 来东, 焦启龙, 安哲昆, 李修彬. 免疫细胞在肾脏缺血再灌注损伤修复中的作用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 45-50.
[10] 张杰, 田广磊, 陈雄. 基于生物信息学分析探讨肝癌BRD4与预后关系及其ceRNA调控网络构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 568-576.
[11] 林玲, 李京儒, 沈瑞华, 林惠, 乔晞. 基于生物信息学分析小鼠急性肾损伤和急性肺损伤的枢纽基因[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 134-144.
[12] 杨永红, 杨莹, 齐红蕾, 刘福瑞, 朱金源. 单细胞测序在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 248-252.
[13] 王光伟, 李桂莲, 王勇. 散发性静脉畸形的靶向治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 380-385.
[14] 杨麦青, 张云香. 胃癌化疗后浆膜腔大B细胞淋巴瘤一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 183-187.
[15] 孙冠超, 万军, 石卉. IgG相关食物不耐受与肠道免疫微环境相关性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 200-203.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?