Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01): 1-6. doi: 10.3877/cmj.j.issn.2095-1221.2020.01.001

Special Issue:

• Original Research •     Next Articles

Effect of interfering FSCN1 gene expression on apoptosis and ROS content in prostate cancer cells

Bihua Deng1,(), Xiaofeng Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Central Hospital of the First People's Hospital of Chenzhou City, Chenzhou 423000, China
  • Received:2019-06-10 Online:2020-02-01 Published:2020-02-01
  • Contact: Bihua Deng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Deng Bihua, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect and mechanism of interfering FSCN1 gene expression on apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in prostate cancer cells.

Methods

The normal prostate epithelial cell RWPE-1 was used as the control, and the expression of FSCN1 mRNA and protein in the LNCaP, DU145 and PC-3 cells of prostate cancer were detected by RT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. LipofectamineTM 2000 was used as the carrier, DU145 cells were divided into si-FSCN1 group (small interfering RNAs targeting FSCN1 transfected DU145 cells) , negative control group (negative control siRNA transfected DU145 cells) and blank control group (untransfected cells) , siRNA was transfected for 48 h, and Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of FSCN1, PCNA, Cleaved caspase3, NF-κB p65, p-NF-κB p65, IKK and p-IKKα. Cell viability was detected by CCK8, and apoptosis rate and ROS level were detected by flow cytometry. One-way analysis of variance was used for comparison between groups, and SNK-q test was used for pairwise comparisons between groups.

Results

Compared with RWPE-1 cells, the expressions of FSCN1 mRNA in LNCaP, DU145 and PC-3cells (1 vs 2.561±0.189, 7.183±0.882, 4.796±0.567, 4.796±0.567) and protein (0.053±0.007 vs 0.217±0.013, 0.654±0.058, 0.316±0.035) were increased (all P< 0.05) . Compared with the negative control group, the expression of FSCN1 in the si-FSCN1 group were decreased (0.473±0.052 vs 0.086±0.010, P< 0.05) . Compared with the si-FSCN1 group, the cell viability of the blank control group and the negative control group (0.302±0.033 vs 0.787±0.069, 0.764±0.063) were increased, while the apoptotic rate (24.54±1.47﹪vs 3.04﹪±0.36﹪, 3.28﹪±0.40﹪) and ROS relative fluorescence intensity (90.04±5.73 vs 47.88±3.62, 49.62±4.11) were decreased (all P< 0.05) . Compared with si-FSCN1 group, the expression of PCNA (0.255±0.032 vs 0.654±0.062, 0.631± 0.058) , NF-κB p65 (0.092±0.011 vs 0.296±0.032, 0.318±0.037) , p-NF-κB p65 (0.042±0.008 vs 0.155±0.018, 0.151±0.016) , IKKα (0.112±0.01 vs 0.172±0.020, 0.192±0.023) and p-IKKα protein (0.051±0.005 vs 0.102±0.011, 0.091±0.009) were increased in blank control group and negative control group, while the expression of Cleaved caspase3 protein (0.206±0.018 vs 0.074±0.009, 0.085±0.010) decreased (all P< 0.05) . There was no significant difference in cell viability, apoptosis rate, ROS levels, and protein expression of FSCN1, PCNA, Cleaved caspase3, NF-κB p65, p-NF-κB p65, IKKα, and p-IKKα in the negative control group and the blank control group (P> 0.05) .

Conclusion

Interfering with FSCN1 gene expression could reduce the activity and induce apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. The mechanism may be related to the increase of ROS level and the decrease of NF- κB signal.

Key words: Prostate cancer, FSCN1 gene, ROS level, Apoptosis, NF-κB signaling pathway

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-591-87982783 E-mail: ccsct@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd