Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05): 257-265. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2025.05.001

• Original Research •     Next Articles

IFI6 promotes the progression of renal cell carcinoma and enhances sunitinib resistance through apoptosis suppression

Senming Cao1,2, Xinran Chen2,3, Chi Zhang1,2, Yi Feng2,3, Xiubin Li2, Wenmei Fan2, Xin Ma1,2,()   

  1. 1School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
    2Senior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
    3Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2025-07-04 Online:2025-10-01 Published:2025-12-15
  • Contact: Xin Ma

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the role of interferon-induced protein 6 (IFI6) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) progression and the molecular mechanism in sunitinib resistance.

Methods

The differences of IFI6 expression between tumor and normal tissues were analyzed using TCGA data and clinical samples. The human RCC cells (786-O and ACHN) was transfected with either non-targeting siRNA control (scramble) or IFI6 siRNA (siIFI6). Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were comparatively assessed between control and knockdown groups using CCK-8 and Transwell assays. Apoptosis-related proteins (caspase3、cleaved caspase3、Bcl2、BAX) were detected via Western blot. IFI6 expression was measured in sunitinib-resistant cells (786-O-SuR), and the changes in the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of sunitinib were evaluated after IFI6 knockdown. Stable OSRC-2 cell lines with IFI6 knockdown (shIFI6) were established, and a subcutaneous tumor xenograft model in nude mice was performed with sunitinib treatment to evaluate its in vivo efficacy. The experiment was divided into four groups: scramble + DMSO, shIFI6 + DMSO, scramble + sunitinib, and shIFI6 + sunitinib. Independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between two groups, and paired samples t-test was used for paired comparisons. For comparisons among three or more groups, one-way ANOVA was employed. Dunnett's t-test was used for pairwise comparison between groups.

Results

IFI6 was significantly upregulated in RCC tissues versus normal tissues (P < 0.05), with high expression correlating with poor prognosis (P < 0.05). IFI6 knockdown markedly suppressed the abilities of proliferation [786-O: (1.33 ± 0.11), (1.24 ± 0.11) vs (2.15 ± 0.15) ; ACHN: (2.03 ± 0.14), (1.59 ± 0.14) vs (3.05 ± 0.18) ; P < 0.05], migration [786-O: (169.67 ± 31.01), (140.67 ± 19.40) vs (371.67 ± 58.05) cells; ACHN: (245.67 ± 33.25), (177.33 ± 18.45) vs (558.00 ± 83.83) cells; P < 0.05], and invasion [786-O: (55.33 ± 9.07), (46.67 ± 7.77) vs (102.00 ± 8.54) cells; ACHN: (43.33 ± 12.66), (37.33 ± 11.93) vs (118.00 ± 12.49) cells; P < 0.05]. Knockdown of IFI6 led to an increased expression of cleaved caspase 3 and BAX, while the expression of total caspase 3 and Bcl2 was decreased. Compared with 786-O, the expression levels of IF16 mRNA and protein were elevated in 786-O-SuR (P < 0.05 for both). The IC50 concentration of sunitinib in the siIFI6-1 and siIFI6-2 groups was significantly lower than that in the Scramble group in 786-O, ACHN and 786-O-SuR cells [ 786-O: (5.02 ± 0.15), (4.40 ± 0.47) vs (7.28 ± 0.28) μmol/L; ACHN: (4.56 ± 0.17), (4.20 ± 0.19) vs (6.68 ± 0.31) μmol/L; 786-O-SuR: (8.02 ± 0.45), (7.50 ± 0.49) vs (16.61 ± 1.16) μmol/L; P < 0.05 for all ]. In vivo tumor formation experiments in nude mice revealed that, the tumor mass and volume in the Scramble + Sunitinib group and shIFI6 + DMSO group were significantly smaller than those in the Scramble + DMSO group [mass: (318.36 ± 40.81), (308.54 ± 36.97) vs (532.76 ± 79.59) mg, volume: (362.68 ± 58.76) and (349.96 ± 59.38) vs (681.20 ± 150.85) mm3; P < 0.05 for all], and the tumor mass and volume in the shIFI6 + Sunitinib group were further reduced compared with the Scramble + Sunitinib group [mass: (109.28 ± 34.43) vs (318.36 ± 40.81) mg, volume: (112.04 ± 40.62) vs (362.68 ± 58.76) mm3; P < 0.05 for all ].

Conclusion

This study reveals that IFI6 promotes RCC progression and confers sunitinib resistance by suppressing apoptosis. Targeting IFI6 sensitizes RCC to therapeutic agents, demonstrating potential clinical significance.

Key words: Renal cell carcinoma, Interferon-induced protein 6, Apoptosis, Progression, Resistance, Sunitinib

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-591-87982783 E-mail: ccsct@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd