切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 65 -70. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2017.02.001

所属专题: 文献

论著

临床级脐带间充质细胞制备及鉴定方法研究
袁艳鹏1, 王淑艳1, 唐玺和1, 刘仲凤1, 张愚1, 陈志国1,()   
  1. 1. 100053 北京,首都医科大学宣武医院细胞治疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-26 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈志国

Generation of clinical grade umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells

Yanpeng Yuan1, Shuyan Wang1, Xihe Tang1, Zhongfeng Liu1, Yu Zhang1, Zhiguo Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Cell Therapy Center, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2016-09-26 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhiguo Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Zhiguo, Email:
引用本文:

袁艳鹏, 王淑艳, 唐玺和, 刘仲凤, 张愚, 陈志国. 临床级脐带间充质细胞制备及鉴定方法研究[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(02): 65-70.

Yanpeng Yuan, Shuyan Wang, Xihe Tang, Zhongfeng Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhiguo Chen. Generation of clinical grade umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(02): 65-70.

目的

在GLP实验室中制备并鉴定临床级脐带间充质细胞(UC-MSC)。

方法

新鲜获取的脐带去除血管并进行充分清洗,获得的华通胶(Wharton’s jelly)机械分离后分别进行直接贴壁法和不同的酶消化法,比较获取UC-MSC的数量差别;用不同的无血清培养基进行培养比较细胞形态是否良好,得到最佳形态的UC-MSC。体外培养第3代后进行UC-MSC质检,包括细胞活性,生长曲线,无菌检测,人类相关病毒、支原体、内毒素检测,染色体核型分析,FACS免疫表型检测及分化能力检测。不同消化方法获取细胞数之间比较采用两样本配对t检验。

结果

胶原酶Ⅱ消化获得的UC-MSC数(5.3×106±0.58个/ml)与胶原酶Ⅰ+ 0.25﹪胰酶消化法(2.53×105±0.03个/ml)及直接贴壁法(2.6×105±0.05个/ml)之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),与胶原酶Ⅰ消化法获取细胞数(5.1×106±0.57个/ml)之间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.07),但培养视野最干净;MesenCult-ACF Medium培养获得的UC-MSC形态最佳;UC-MSC质检细胞活性冻存前达99.8﹪,冻存复苏后达99﹪;无细菌、支原体、乙肝病毒、丙肝病毒、梅毒螺旋体、艾滋病毒、肺炎支原体、EB病毒、巨细胞病毒污染;内毒素检测结果均< 1 EU;CD73/CD90/CD105阳性率达98﹪,CD34/CD45/HLA-DR呈阴性,阳性率< 2﹪;染色体核型分析无突变或缺失;UC-MSC具有成脂、成骨或成软骨方向分化的能力。

结论

通过优化分离和培养条件,采用无血清及无动物来源的培养系统,在GLP实验室内可获得临床级UC-MSC。

Objective

To produce clinical grade umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) with a umbilical cord in a GLP lab.

Methods

The umbilical cord was collected after delivery and the arteries, veins and blood cells were removed. Different treatment conditions were applied to compare the yield of UC-MSCs. The Wharton's jelly was cut to 1 mm3 cubes, which were then either directly placed into an adhesive culture dish, or digested with different types of collagenases, followed by expansion in three types of serum free culture medium. After three passages in vitro, the cells were characterized and analyzed for cell viability, morphology, growth, sterility, endotoxin levels, chromosome karyotyping, surface antigen expression and differentiation capacity. Data analysis between different groups was performed with coupled t test.

Results

Digestion with collagenaseⅡor collagenaseⅠachieved the highest yield of MSCs (5.3×106±0.58/ml and 5.1×106±0.57/ml, respectively, P = 0.07) , both higher than treatment with collagenaseⅠ+ 0.25﹪trypsin (2.53×105±0.03/ml) and enzyme-free method. The culture medium appeared clear after collagenaseⅡdigestion. MSCs cultured in Stemcell MesenCult-ACF Medium showed optimal cell morphology. Before freezing, the cell viability was 99.8﹪, and 99﹪ after freezing and thawing. The obtained MSCs were negative for bacteria or mycoplasma contamination, hepatitis B virus (HBV) , hepatitis C virus (HCV) , human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) , Mycoplasma pneumonia (MP) , Treponema pallidum (TP) , EB virus (EBV) , and cytomegalovirus (CMV) . The endotoxin levels were less than 1 EU as tested by ELISA. FACS results showed that more than 98﹪of the obtained cells were positive for CD73, CD90 and CD105, and more than 98﹪of the cells negative for CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR. The cells showed a normal karyotype and could be differentiated into adipocytes, osteoblasts and cartilage cells.

Conclusion

Clinical grade MSCs are generated in a GLP lab with optimized isolation/culture conditions.

图1 不同酶消化法获取细胞数比较
图2 倒置相差显微镜下观察不同培养基获取UC-MSC形态比较(×20)
图3 UC-MSC生长曲线
图4 支原体PCR检测结果
图5 UC-MSC染色体核型分析
表1 UC-MSC不同代次细胞内毒素检测结果
图6 UC-MSC免疫表型FACS检测结果
图7 倒置相差显微镜下观察UC-MSC成骨、成脂、成软骨分化结果(×20)
1
Caplan AL. Mesenchymal stem cell[J]. J Orthop Res, 1991, 9(05):641-650.
2
Vemuri MC, Chase LG, Rao MS. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Assays and Applications[M]. London:Humana Press, 2011:11-200.
3
Pham PV, Truong NC, Phuong TL, et al. Isolation and proliferation of umbilical cord tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells for clinical applications[J]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2016, 17(2):289-302.
4
Thomas Vangsness JC, Sternberg H, Harris L. UC tissue offers the grestest number of harvestable mesenchymal stem cells for research and clinical application: A Literature Review of Different Harvest Sites[J]. The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2015, 31(9):1836-1843.
5
王菲,周洪,郭昱成, 等. 原代人脐带间充质干细胞培养方法的研究[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014,18(19):3042-3047.
6
刘玲英,柴家科,段红杰, 等. 人脐带间充质干细胞不同分离方法的效果比较[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2013,93(32):2592-2596.
7
辛毅,李娜,黄益民, 等. 人脐带间充质干细胞的原代培养及多向分化潜能的研究[J]. 细胞与分子免疫学杂志, 2013, 29(10):1087-1093.
8
孙瑞婷,陈瑶瑶,王华, 等. 脐带来源间充质干细胞的制备及其质量检定[J]. 中国医药生物技术, 2013, 8(6):401-407.
9
祝加学,沈尊理,秦金保, 等. 一种大量快速分离脐带间充质干细胞的新方法[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2010, 10(6):1164-1169.
10
郝世凯,苏相相,洪敬欣. 不同消化时间下胶原酶对人脐带间充质干细胞分离的影响[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2014, 5(24):36-40.
11
吴洁莹,陆琰,陈劲松, 等. 脐血血浆替代胎牛血清培养脐带间充质干细胞及冷冻保存[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(37):5947-5954.
12
李兰兰,马炬明,陈玲肖. 脐带间充质干细胞无血清培养的实验研究[J]. 中国现代医生, 2013, 51(27):85-87.
13
Brun J, Abruzzese T, Rolauffs B, et al. Choice of xenogenic-free expansion media significantly influences the myogenic differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells[J]. Cytotherapy, 2016, 18(3):344-359.
14
中国医师协会神经修复学专业委员会,国际神经修复学会中国分会. 中国神经修复细胞治疗临床应用指南(2015年版)[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志:电子版, 2016, 6(1):1-7.
15
李洁,傅勇辉,吴琼, 等. 冻存前后脐带间充质干细胞生物学特性的比较[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2014, 32(1):8-10.
16
Pham PV, Vu NB, Pham VM, et al. Good manufacturing practice-compliant isolation and culture of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 2014,12(1):56-65.
[1] 甘菊芬, 周怡, 邱文倩, 李亮, 高传芬, 李婉炎, 张超学. 脐带打结的超声诊断及其对胎儿围产期结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(07): 676-680.
[2] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[3] 悦光, 卢江溢, 周小凤, 王倩颖, 巨容. 胎盘输血技术发展现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 393-399.
[4] 初磊, 郭翼, 童晓文. Periostin在妇科恶性肿瘤中的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 145-149.
[5] 朱娟娟, 古航, 王蓓, 韩树萍, 朱建幸, 谢利娟. 基于全国性问卷调查的延迟脐带结扎影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 67-72.
[6] 尹娟, 杨兴, 李平, 徐旻馨, 鲍玉, 张志鹏, 薛慧. 低强度脉冲式超声波在脂多糖诱导的RAW264.7巨噬细胞分化中的抗炎和抗氧化作用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 26-36.
[7] 唐英俊, 李华娟, 王赛妮, 徐旺, 刘峰, 李羲, 郝新宝, 黄华萍. 人脐带间充质干细胞治疗COPD小鼠及机制分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 476-480.
[8] 刘娜, 赵然然. 支气管哮喘微量元素水平与免疫功能的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 74-76.
[9] 崔燕妮, 任颜, 梁凤婷, 覃艳红, 王宏伟. 脐带血源性产品Omidubicel的临床研发进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 178-182.
[10] 李婧娴, 韩兴龙, 涂元媛, 胡士军, 于淼, 雷伟. 内皮祖细胞在血管损伤修复中的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 176-180.
[11] 王继荣, 暴一众, 唐颖, 吕晓玲, 杨舟鑫. 吴茱萸碱抑制破骨细胞分化延缓骨丢失的研究[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 86-92.
[12] 李华, 李晓帆, 李乃农. 间充质干细胞促进脐带血干细胞体外扩增的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 34-38.
[13] 杜为, 崔丽娟, 徐迎, 张华, 杜宏伟, 张金美, 刘容志, 王征宇, 杨文玲, 张宇. 脐带血单个核细胞诱导多能干细胞来源自然杀伤细胞的生物学特性[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 329-336.
[14] 陈婷婷, 江学良, 余佳丽, 柯剑林. 干细胞治疗炎症性肠病的安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[15] 梁宇同, 丁旭, 马国慧, 黄艳红. 间充质干细胞在宫腔粘连治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 596-599.
阅读次数
全文


摘要