切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 7 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2017.01.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

利用纳米碳与亚甲蓝示踪甲状腺乳头状癌前哨淋巴结的对比研究
陈杰1, 周晓红1,(), 李真华1, 葛家华1, 何云1, 张玉莲1   
  1. 1. 400030 重庆市肿瘤研究所
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-11 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 周晓红

Comparison between carbon nanoparticles and methylene blue on cell tracking of sentinel lymph node for papillary thyroid carcinoma

Jie Chen1, Xiaohong Zhou1,(), Zhenhua Li1, Jiahua Ge1, Yun He1, Yulian Zhang1   

  1. 1. Chongqing Cancer Reserch Institute, Chongqing 400030, China
  • Received:2016-07-11 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaohong Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Zhou Xiaohong, Email:
引用本文:

陈杰, 周晓红, 李真华, 葛家华, 何云, 张玉莲. 利用纳米碳与亚甲蓝示踪甲状腺乳头状癌前哨淋巴结的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(01): 7-11.

Jie Chen, Xiaohong Zhou, Zhenhua Li, Jiahua Ge, Yun He, Yulian Zhang. Comparison between carbon nanoparticles and methylene blue on cell tracking of sentinel lymph node for papillary thyroid carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(01): 7-11.

目的

探讨亚甲蓝和纳米碳混悬注射液细胞染色示踪甲状腺乳头状癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)的价值。

方法

选择130例甲状腺乳头状癌患者,按不平衡指数最小分配原则随机分为2组,分别用亚甲蓝及纳米碳行SLN活检术,记录SLN的位置及数目,随后行患侧功能性颈淋巴结清扫术,将SLN及清扫的淋巴结分别进行HE染色观察,采用t检验、χ2检验、fisher确切概率法对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

亚甲蓝组65例检出SLN 52例,27例为阳性,其检出率、灵敏度、准确率和假阴性率分别为80.00﹪、84.38﹪、90.38﹪、15.62﹪。纳米碳组65例检出SLN 61例,30例为阳性,其检出率、灵敏度、准确率和假阴性率分别为93.84﹪、90.91﹪、95.08﹪、9.09﹪,除检出率相比差异有统计学意义(χ2= 5.482,P = 0.019),灵敏度、准确率、假阴性率相比差异无统计学意义(fisher确切概率法,P = 0.475、0.467、0.475)。两组所检出的SLN在各区的分布情况差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.043、P = 0.791),两组均在Ⅳ区和Ⅵ区的检出率、阳性率最高,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.043,P = 0.425;χ2=0.012,P = 0.914)。

结论

纳米碳与亚甲蓝在甲状腺乳头状癌术中细胞示踪SLN均具有可行性,能准确反映颈部淋巴结的状况,对甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结的清扫具有指导意义,纳米碳较亚甲蓝能获得较清晰的术野,对SLN检出率高,值得推广。

Objective

To evaluate the value of methylene blue and carbon nanoparticles as cell tracer in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Methods

130 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups randomly, which were given sentinel lymph node biopsy with either methylene blue or carbon nanoparticles. The sentinel lymph node location and number were recorded, followed by ipsilateral functional cervix lymph node dissection. Then the sentinel lymph node and dissected cervix lymph nodes were subject to pathology examination respectively. Experimental data were statistically analyzed byttest, chi-square test and fisher exact probability test when appropriate.

Results

In 65 patients in the methylene blue group, SLN were identified in 52 patients, with 27 having histopathologically positive lymph nodes. The detection rate, sensitivity, accuracy rate and false negative rate were 80﹪, 84.38﹪, 90.38﹪, and 15.62﹪, respectively. Whereas in the carbon nanoparticles group, SLN were identified in 61 patients, with 30 having histopathologically positive lymph nodes.The detection rate, sensitivity, accuracy rate and false negative rate were 93.84﹪, 90.91﹪, 95.08﹪, and 9.09﹪, respectively.The difference of the detection rate was significant (χ2= 5.482, P= 0.019) . There was no significantly difference on the distribution of the detected SLN in regions between the two groups (χ2= 1.043,P= 0.791) .The detection rate and positive rate of SLN were both highest in regionⅣandⅥin the two groups.And there was no significantly difference between the two groups (χ2= 1.043, P= 0.425; χ2= 0.012, P= 0.914) .

Conclutions

Methylene blue and cabon nanoparticles are both feasible in intraoperative SLN identification. They could reflect lymphatic metastasis accurately and be instructive to cervix lymph nodes dissection. Carbon nanoparticles tracer provides clearer surgery field and has higher detection rate.

图1 甲状腺乳头癌患者前哨淋巴结活检
图2 光学显微镜下观察前哨淋巴结形态(HE染色)
表1 甲状腺癌患者前哨淋巴结转移位置及转移情况
表2 甲状腺癌患者亚甲蓝组及纳米碳组检出情况
1
Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1977, 39(2):456-466.
2
双羽,李超,黄永望.前哨淋巴结检测在头颈部肿瘤中的研究进展[J].中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2015, 15(1):61-64.
3
Hao RT, Chen J, Zhao LH, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using Carbon nanoparticles for Chinese patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J].Eur J Surg Oncol, 2012, 38(8):718-724.
4
吴在德,吴肇汉,郑树,等.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2003: 313-316.
5
江国斌,方红燕,蔡建明.纳米碳混悬液示踪前哨淋巴结在甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用[J].中国癌症杂志, 2010, 20(12):939-940.
6
贾中明,刘艳,黄秋林.纳米碳定位前哨淋巴结在cN0甲状腺乳头状癌中的临床研究[J].临床合理用药, 2011, 4(9):9-10.
7
胡家永,张海威,周永华,等.Ⅵ区淋巴结清扫治疗cN0期甲状腺乳头状癌38例临床分析[J].中华内分泌外科杂志, 2013, 7(1):8-10.
8
蔡蕾,华清泉.前哨淋巴结检测在甲状腺癌中的应用[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 27(4):222-224.
9
Asín L, Ibarra MR, Tres A, et al. Controlled cell death by magnetic hyperthermia: effects of exposure time, field amplitude, and nanoparticle concentration[J]. Pharm Res, 2012, 29(5):1319-1327.
10
Madru R, Kjellman P, Olsson F, et al.99mTc-labeled superparamagnetic Iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodality SPECT/MRI of sentinel lymph nodes[J].J Nucl Med, 2012, 53(3):459-463.
11
邓维叶,李浩,陈艳峰,等.纳米碳混悬液在甲状腺乳头状癌术中应用的研究[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2014, 8(6):451-455.
12
朱精强,汪洵理,魏涛,等.纳米碳甲状旁腺负显影辨认保护技术在甲状腺癌手术中的应用[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2013, 20(9):992-994.
13
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J].Thyroid, 2006, 16(2):109-142.
14
郑雅娟,袁宏钧,仲妙春,等.分化型甲状腺癌颈部淋巴结转移相关因素分析[J].浙江医学, 2013, 35(5):361-363.
15
吴毅.《甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌临床诊治指南》热点解读[J].中华内分泌外科杂志, 2012, 6(1):1-2.
16
潘利,朱理玮,李斌辉,等.中央区淋巴结清扫术治疗cN0期甲状腺乳头状癌的可行性分析[J].天津医科大学学报, 2010, 16(4):619-621.
[1] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[2] 费翔, 马帅, 张颖, 高洋, 毕冬宁, 孙平东, 崔建春. 乳腺腺叶可视化技术在乳管内乳头状瘤手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 464-464.
[3] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[4] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[5] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[6] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[7] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[8] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[9] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[10] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[11] 宋佳, 汪波, 孙凯律, 商江峰, 吴旦平, 肇毅. 吲哚菁绿荧光显影联合亚甲蓝染色在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 498-501.
[12] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[13] 张卫锋, 张天翼, 赵正维, 王海强, 尹逊亮. VE /VCO2 斜率对肺癌肺叶切除术后心血管并发症的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 725-730.
[14] 董大红, 周明虎, 李芝朋, 许正峰. 碳青霉烯类抗生素联合呼吸机治疗肺部感染的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 793-796.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要