切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 65 -73. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-1221.2026.02.001

论著

急性B淋巴细胞白血病患者骨髓来源NK细胞的生物学表型特征
胡倩雯1, 徐铭亿2,3, 孙珊4, 苏刚3, 张珊珊3, 张文霞5,6, 史明霞1, 张磊升2,3,(), 李金文3,()   
  1. 1650032 昆明医科大学第一附属医院血液科 云南省血液病研究中心
    2261053 潍坊,山东第二医科大学生命科学与技术学院
    3250031 济南,山东第二医科大学附属济南市第四人民医院科创中心 山东省医药卫生血液生态与生物智造重点实验室 济南市医学细胞生物工程重点实验室
    4250021 济南市槐荫人民医院整形外科
    5050000 石家庄,河北医科大学第二医院血液科 河北省血液病重点实验室
    6065900 廊坊,河北省大城县医院普内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-01 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张磊升, 李金文
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82260031、82460027); 山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2025MS1382); 江西省自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(20252BAC210008); 山东省医药卫生科技项目面上项目(202402050122); 泰山学者青年专家专项基金(tsqnz20240858); 济南市卫生健康委员会科技发展计划项目(2024301008、2025202005); 济南市科技计划临床医学科技创新项目(202430055); 江西省"双千计划"领军人才(jxsq2023102017)

Biophenotypic characterization of bone marrow-derived natural killer cells in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Qianwen Hu1, Mingyi Xu2,3, Shan Sun4, Gang Su3, Shanshan Zhang3, Wenxia Zhang5,6, Mingxia Shi1, Leisheng Zhang2,3,(), Jinwen Li3,()   

  1. 1Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, the Research Center for Hematological Diseases of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, China
    2College of Life Sciences and Technology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261053, China
    3Shandong Provincial Key Medical and Health Laboratory of Blood Ecology and Biointelligence, Jinan Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Bioengineering, Science and Technology Innovation Center, the Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan Affiliated to Shandong Second Medical University, Jinan 250031, China
    4Department of Plastic Surgery, Jinan Huaiyin People’s Hospital, Jinan 250021, China
    5Department of Hematology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Hematology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    6Department of General Internal Medicine, Hebei Dacheng County Hospital, Langfang 065900, China
  • Received:2025-09-01 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Leisheng Zhang, Jinwen Li
  • About author:

    Hu Qianwen and Xu Mingyi are the first author who contributed equally to the article

引用本文:

胡倩雯, 徐铭亿, 孙珊, 苏刚, 张珊珊, 张文霞, 史明霞, 张磊升, 李金文. 急性B淋巴细胞白血病患者骨髓来源NK细胞的生物学表型特征[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 65-73.

Qianwen Hu, Mingyi Xu, Shan Sun, Gang Su, Shanshan Zhang, Wenxia Zhang, Mingxia Shi, Leisheng Zhang, Jinwen Li. Biophenotypic characterization of bone marrow-derived natural killer cells in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(02): 65-73.

目的

探讨健康供者(HD)与急性B淋巴细胞白血病患者(B-ALL)骨髓单个核细胞中的自然杀伤(NK)细胞,以及在体外活化扩增产生的NK细胞生物学表型和细胞毒作用的异同。

方法

收集HD和B-ALL患者的骨髓血,经过密度梯度离心富集单个核细胞,采用流式细胞术分析二者的驻留型NK细胞(HD-NK,BALL-NK)的表型;基于课题组建立的"3ILs [白细胞介素-2 (IL-2),IL-15,IL-18]"体外高效活化扩增体系,采用细胞计数、流式细胞分析和体外共培养杀伤实验,比较二者培养14 d后获得的扩增型eHD-NK细胞和eBALL-NK细胞的表型和细胞毒作用。组间比较采用独立样本t检验;HD-NK、eHD-NK、BALL-NK、eBALL-NK四组间的比较采用两因素重复测量方差分析,两两比较采用Bonferroni事后检验。

结果

与HD组相比,B-ALL患者CD3-CD56+总NK细胞比例[(4.21 ± 0.92)%比(14.25 ± 1.15)%]、CD16+ NK细胞[(46.82 ± 2.96)%比(67.87 ± 2.12)%]、NKG2D+ NK细胞[(22.45 ± 2.12)%比(50.82 ± 5.65)%]和NKp46+ NK细胞比例[(7.66 ± 1.73)%比(17.27 ± 1.75)%]均降低(P均< 0.05)。经过体外活化扩增的eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组中的总NK细胞比例均提升,与eBALL-NK组比较,eHD-NK组的总NK细胞比例[(61.52 ± 3.18)%比(24.63 ± 2.07)%]、NKG2D+ NK细胞[(80.63 ± 2.03)%比(57.83 ± 8.55)%]、CD25+ NK细胞[(37.45 ± 3.21)%比(20.90 ± 5.15)%]和NKp46+NK细胞比例[(27.23 ± 2.30)%比(9.51 ± 0.98)%]均升高(P均< 0.05)。细胞活力分析显示,HD组的总NK细胞体外活化扩增效率高于B-ALL组。与eHD-NK组比较,eBALL-NK组的Annexin Ⅴ+ 7-AAD- [(4.50 ± 0.35)%比(2.72 ± 0.43)%]和Annexin Ⅴ+细胞凋亡比例[ (5.13 ± 0.62)%比(3.29 ± 0.58)%]均升高,两组间细胞周期分布差异无统计学意义。体外杀伤共培养实验显示,eHD-NK对肿瘤细胞系Nalm6、U937的杀伤能力高于eBALL-NK组。

结论

相较于HD,B-ALL患者骨髓血来源的驻留型和活化型NK细胞比例、活化亚群含量、体外活化能力、细胞活力和细胞毒等方面均较低,这一研究为后续探究致病机制和临床治疗提供有益参考。

Objective

To explore the similarities and differences in the biological phenotypes and cytotoxicity of resident and expanded natural killer cells derived from mononuclear cells of human bone marrow between healthy donors (HD) and patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) .

Methods

Bone marrow blood of HD and B-ALL was collected, and mononuclear cells were enriched by density gradient centrifugation. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the phenotypes of resident NK cells (HD-NK and BALL-NK) in the two types of blood. Then, with the aid of our well-established 14-day "3ILs"-based (short for IL-2, IL-15, IL-18) culture system for in vitro high-efficient activation and expansion of NK cells, we conducted cell counting, flow cytometry analysis and in vitro co-culture killing tests to compare the phenotypes and cytotoxicity of expanded HD-NK cells (eHD-NK) and expanded BALL-NK cells (eBALL-NK) in bone marrow blood. Comparisons between two groups were performed using independent samples t-test. Comparisons among the four groups (HD-NK, eHD-NK, BALL-NK, and eBALL-NK) were conducted using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test for pairwise comparisons.

Results

Compared with the healthy donor (HD) group, the proportion of total CD3-CD56+ NK cells in the non-activated, expanded resident NK cell population from patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) was significantly lower [ (4.21 ± 0.92) % vs (14.25 ± 1.15) %]. In addition, the frequencies of activated NK cell subsets were reduced, including CD16+ NK cells [ (46.82 ± 2.96) % vs (67.87 ± 2.12) %], NKG2D+ NK cells [ (22.45 ± 2.12) %vs (50.82 ± 5.65) %], and NKp46+ NK cells [ (7.66 ± 1.73) % vs (17.27 ± 1.75) %]. Following in vitro activation and expansion, the proportion of total NK cells was significantly increased in both the expanded HD-NK (eHD-NK) group and the expanded B-ALL-derived NK (eBALL-NK) group [ (61.52 ± 3.18) % vs (14.25 ± 1.15) %]; (24.63 ± 2.07) % vs (4.21 ± 0.92) %]. Moreover, the eHD-NK group exhibited higher proportions of total NK cells [ (61.52 ± 3.18) % vs (24.63 ± 2.07) %] and multiple activated NK cell subsets than the eBALL-NK group, including NKG2D+ NK cells [ (80.63 ± 2.03) % vs (57.83 ± 8.55) %], CD25+ NK cells [ (37.45 ± 3.21) %vs (20.90 ± 5.15) %], and NKp46+ NK cells [ (27.23 ± 2.30) % vs (9.51 ± 0.98) %]. Cell viability analysis demonstrated that the efficiency of in vitro activation and expansion of total NK cells was higher in the HD group than in the B-ALL group. Compared with the eHD-NK group, the eBALL-NK group showed significantly higher proportions of apoptotic cells, including Annexin V+7-AAD- cells [ (4.50 ± 0.35) % vs (2.72 ± 0.43) %] and Annexin V+ cells [ (5.13 ± 0.62) % vs (3.29 ± 0.58) %], while no significant differences in cell cycle distribution were observed between the two groups. In vitro cytotoxicity co-culture assays revealed that eHD-NK cells exhibited stronger cytotoxic activity against the tumor cell lines Nalm6 and U937 compared with eBALL-NK cells.

Conclusion

Compared with HDs, bone marrow–derived resident and activated NK cells from B-ALL patients exhibited reduced proportions, diminished activated subpopulation content, impaired in vitro activation capacity, decreased cellular viability, and attenuated cytotoxicity. This study provides valuable reference for subsequent investigations into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and the development of clinical therapeutic strategies.

图1 HD-NK组和BALL-NK组CD3-CD56+总NK细胞含量比较注:a图为两组CD3- CD56+总NK细胞的流式细胞分析散点分析;b图为两组CD3-CD56+总NK细胞含量对比;**P < 0.01
图2 HD-NK组和BALL-NK组各细胞亚群含量比较注:a图为HD-NK组和BALL-NK组的总活化型NK细胞(CD3- CD56+ CD16+)、记忆性CD25+ NK细胞亚群和多个活化型细胞亚群(NKG2D+、Np44+、NKp46+)的流式细胞分析;*P < 0.05;***P < 0.001;ns为差异无统计学意义
图3 HD组和BALL组总T细胞、NK T细胞和T细胞亚群的含量对比注:a图为两组T细胞的含量对比;b图为两组NKT细胞的含量对比,c图为两组CD4+ T细胞的含量对比,d图为两组CD8+ T细胞的含量对比;**P < 0.01,****P < 0.000 1,ns为差异无统计学意义
图4 HD-NK和BALL-NK两组NK细胞体外扩增效率对比注:a图为光学显微镜下观察HD-NK组和BALL-NK组NK细胞体外活化扩增形态(×100);b图为HD-NK组和BALL-NK组的NK细胞扩增倍数比较,**P < 0.01
图5 eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组CD3-CD56+总NK细胞含量比较注:a图为扩增型NK细胞组(eHD-NK,eBALL-NK)中总NK细胞含量流式细胞术测定;b图为驻留型NK细胞组(HD-NK,BALL-NK)和扩增型NK细胞组(eHD-NK,eBALL-NK)中总NK细胞的含量对比,**P < 0.01,***P < 0.001,****P < 0.000 1
图6 eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组各细胞亚群含量比较注:a图为eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组的总活化型NK细胞(CD3- CD56+ CD16+)、记忆性CD25+ NK细胞亚群和多个活化型细胞亚群(NKG2D+、NKp44+、NKp46+)的流式细胞分析和NK细胞亚群含量比较;*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01,ns为差异无统计学意义
图7 HD-NK、BALL-NK和eHD-NK、eBALL-NK四组中NK细胞亚群的含量对比注:驻留型NK细胞组(HD-NK,BALL-NK)和扩增型NK细胞组(eHD-NK,eBALL-NK)中的各个NK细胞亚群的含量对比;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001;****P < 0.000 1;ns为差异无统计学意义
图8 eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组的扩增型NK细胞活力比较注:a ~ b图为eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组的总NK细胞(CD3- CD56+)中的细胞凋亡流式细胞分析和NK细胞比例对比;c ~ d图为eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组的总NK细胞(CD3- CD56+)中的细胞周期流式细胞分析和NK细胞比例对比;*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01,ns为差异无统计学意义
图9 eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组扩增型NK细胞的细胞毒活性比较注:a ~ b图为eHD-NK组和eBALL-NK组的总NK细胞单独培养组和肿瘤细胞系共培养组的细胞膜表面CD107a表达流式细胞分析和NK细胞CD107a表达水平比较;c ~ d图为各组中的残存肿瘤细胞数统计和细胞毒活力比较;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001;ns为差异无统计学意义
1
Van Outersterp I, Boer JM, Sonneveld E, et al. Multilineage involvement in ABL-class fusion-positive pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: CML-like biology[J]. Haematologica, 2025. Online ahead of print.
2
O'Connor TE, Lin C, Roloff GW, et al. The impact of social determinants of health on outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2025, 60(11): 1465-1471.
3
Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, et al. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of more than 1 500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993[J]. Blood, 2005, 106(12):3760-3767.
4
Ferrao Blanco MN, Kazybay B, Belderbos M, et al. Distinct stromal cell populations define the B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia microenvironment[J]. Leukemia, 2025, 39(11): 2622-2639.
5
Zhang L, Meng Y, Feng X, et al. CAR-NK cells for cancer immunotherapy: from bench to bedside[J]. Biomark Res, 2022, 10(1): 12.
6
Zhang L, Liu M, Yang S, et al. Natural killer cells: of-the-shelf cytotherapy for cancer immunosurveillance[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2021, 11(4):1770-1791.
7
Nakamura M, Tanaka Y, Hakoda K, et al. Antitumor effects of natural killer cells derived from gene-engineered human-induced pluripotent stem cells on hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2025, 74(3):99.
8
Zhang L, Meng Y, Yao H, et al. CAR-NK cells for acute myeloid leukemia immunotherapy: past, present and future[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2023, 13(11):5559-5576.
9
Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(1):45-56.
10
Crinier A, Narni-Mancinelli E, Ugolini S, et al. SnapShot: Natural Killer Cells[J]. Cell, 2020, 180(6):1280-1280.e1.
11
Plaza-Florido A, Perlsteyn M, Haddad F, et al. Distinct NK cell function and gene expression in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission before and after acute exercise: an exploratory study[J]. Front Immunol, 2025, 16:1625437.
12
Zhang L, Yang S, Chen H, et al. Characterization of the biological and transcriptomic signatures of natural killer cells derived from cord blood and peripheral blood[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2023, 13(8):3531-3546.
13
Zhang L, Sun Y, Xue CE, et al. Uncovering the cellular and omics characteristics of natural killer cells in the bone marrow microenvironment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Cancer Cell Int, 2024, 24(1):106.
14
Nabhan M, Louka ML, Khairy E, et al. MicroRNA-181a and its target Smad 7 as potential biomarkers for tracking child acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Gene, 2017, 628:253-258.
15
Yang YL, Yen CT, Pai CH, et al. A double negative loop comprising ETV6/RUNX1 and MIR181A1 contributes to differentiation block in t(12;21)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(11):e0142863.
16
Dong Z, Cruz-Munoz ME, Zhong MC, et al. Essential function for SAP family adaptors in the surveillance of hematopoietic cells by natural killer cells[J]. Nat Immunol, 2009, 10(9):973-980.
17
Zingoni A, Molfetta R, Fionda C, et al. Nkg2d and its ligands: "one for all, all for one"[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9:476.
18
O'Brien KL, Finlay DK. Immunometabolism and natural killer cell responses[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2019, 19(5):282-290.
19
Long EO. Negative signaling by inhibitory receptors: the NK cell paradigm[J]. Immunol Rev, 2008, 224:70-84.
20
Xie B, Zhang L, Gao J, et al. Decoding the biological properties and transcriptomic landscapes of human natural killer cells derived from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2023, 13(5):2087-2103.
21
Liu M, Meng Y, Zhang L, et al. High-efficient generation of natural killer cells from peripheral blood with preferable cell vitality and enhanced cytotoxicity by combination of IL-2, IL-15 and IL-18[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2021, 534:149-156.
22
Gao H, Liu M, Zhang Y, et al. Multifaceted characterization of the biological and transcriptomic signatures of natural killer cells derived from cord blood and placental blood[J]. Cancer Cell Int, 2022, 22(1):291.
23
Zhang L, Liu M, Song B, et al. Decoding the multidimensional signatures of resident and expanded natural killer cells generated from perinatal blood[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2022, 12(5):2132-2145.
24
Rouce R H, Shaim H, Sekine T, et al. The TGF-β/SMAD pathway is an important mechanism for NK cell immune evasion in childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Leukemia, 2016, 30(4):800-811.
25
Vicioso Y, Gram H, Beck R, et al. Combination therapy for treating advanced drug-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Cancer Immunology Research, 2019, 7(7):1106-1119.
26
Yu H, Huang T, Wang D, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia-derived exosome inhibits cytotoxicity of natural killer cells by TGF-β signaling pathway[J]. 3 Biotech, 2021, 11(7):313.
27
Xing S, Ferrari de Andrade L. NKG2D and MICA/B shedding: a 'tag game' between NK cells and malignant cells[J]. Clin Transl Immunology, 2020, 9(12):e1230.
28
Borst L, Van der Burg S H, Van Hall T. The NKG2A-HLA-E Axis as a novel checkpoint in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2020, 26(21):5549-5556.
29
Muller S, Bexte T, Gebel V, et al. High cytotoxic efficiency of lentivirally and alpharetrovirally engineered CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells against acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10:3123.
30
Marin D, Li Y, Basar R, et al. Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19+ B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(3): 772-784.
31
Jørgensen LV, Christensen EB, Barnkob MB, et al. The clinical landscape of CAR NK cells[J]. Exp Hematol Oncol, 2025, 14(1):46.
[1] 金烨莹, 王艺璇, 杨瑞. 基于单细胞RNA测序的乳腺癌肿瘤相关巨噬细胞亚群鉴定与临床预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 339-347.
[2] 张霞, 冯娅娆, 罗寰, 杨金良, 张斌, 郑学军. 尪痹胶囊联合来氟米特对类风湿关节炎炎症指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 55-64.
[3] 范舒舒, 李玉凤, 林莉, 龙梅, 汪成, 何金娜. 血清25-羟维生素D水平对体外受精-胚胎移植助孕患者妊娠结局的影响及其与外周血和卵泡液淋巴细胞亚群相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 580-589.
[4] 王锃涛, 王宪波, 曹钰, 郝禹, 韩俊燕, 曾辉. 基于多色流式降维聚类方法的自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者T淋巴细胞亚群分析[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 92-101.
[5] 袁瑞, 胡文佳, 桂希恩, 严亚军, 冯玲, 柯亨宁, 熊勇, 杨蓉蓉. 淋巴细胞精细分型检测在人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 84-91.
[6] 李赞, 许芝彬, 冯志金, 张雄. 重型β-地中海贫血患儿异基因造血干细胞移植后淋巴细胞亚群动态分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 22-29.
[7] 刘小丽, 罗倩, 种玉婷, 向贇, 马群宝, 莫亚斯尔·热合木拉, 黄玉蓉. 抗血管生成药物联合PD-1单抗治疗NSCLC的疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 510-515.
[8] 陈向军, 王在强, 王博荣, 王莉, 方芳, 金发光, 王光辉. PM2.5通过激活颗粒酶B/IL-18信号通路促进炎症因子表达[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 207-211.
[9] 刘宝刚, 李磊强, 孙立哲, 耿翠翠. 生物免疫疗法联合放化疗对NSCLC患者CD3、CD4/CD8、NK的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 661-663.
[10] 李翠平, 陈晓燕, 钱师宇, 林惠珠, 曾彩辉, 阳莉, 卢建溪. 不同抗凝剂保存液对脐血培养的NK细胞增殖及杀伤效应的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 572-576.
[11] 李艳, 呼霞, 赵娟. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后应激指标、炎症因子、T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 393-397.
[12] 高星星, 雷东红, 田小飞, 郝持强. 轮状病毒肠炎患儿血清I-FABP、HMGB1、T 淋巴细胞亚群变化与病情严重程度的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 272-276.
[13] 张姗姗, 叶金锋, 吴立红, 古春明. 广州市肺炎支原体致儿童呼吸系统感染的流行病学及外周血淋巴细胞亚群水平的初步分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 33-38.
[14] 计超, 向群. 乙酰胆碱受体对急性呼吸窘迫综合征小鼠T细胞亚群和炎症因子的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 50-56.
[15] 孟丽君, 宋芹, 邵莉, 李健. 系统性红斑狼疮合并肺动脉高压患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群水平变化及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 38-43.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?